Literature DB >> 8676424

Allogeneic fibroblasts used to grow cultured epidermal autografts persist in vivo and sensitize the graft recipient for accelerated second-set rejection.

C S Hultman1, G M Brinson, S Siltharm, S deSerres, B A Cairns, H D Peterson, A A Meyer.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Cultured epidermal autografts (CEAs) have been used for wound coverage in patients with massive burns and other skin defects. However, CEAs often display late breakdown, which may be immunologically mediated and initiated by persistent foreign fibroblasts used as a feeder layer to optimize keratinocyte growth. This study investigates whether these fibroblasts, previously shown to persist in vitro, survive after grafting and induce host sensitization to alloantigen.
METHODS: CEAs from CBA donors (H-2k) were grown on allogeneic NIH 3T3 (H-2q) or syngeneic LTK (H-2k) fibroblasts, which were removed by trypsinization 7 days later. CBA mice (n = 85) were flank-grafted with NIH allografts (positive control), CEA/3T3s, CEA/LTKs, or CBA autografts (negative control). Hosts were challenged with second set NIH tail allografts 3 weeks later. Median graft survival was compared between groups by Wilcoxon rank and chi 2 analysis. Additional CBA mice (n = 15) received CEAs that were biopsied 0, 4, and 8 days after grafting. The presence of allogeneic fibroblasts was determined by Western immunoblotting, using KL295, a monoclonal antibody that recognizes H-2q (but not H-2k) class II histocompatibility antigens.
RESULTS: Allogeneic fibroblasts persisted after grafting but decreased over time, as determined by alloantigen expression on Western immunoblots. Accelerated tail graft rejection occurred in hosts primed by NIH allografts (9 days, p < 0.05), as well as by CEAs growth with an allogeneic (10 days, p < 0.05) but not a syngeneic feeder layer (12 days, NS). Mice receiving flank autografts rejected second set tail allografts at 12 days.
CONCLUSIONS: Immunogenic fibroblasts used to grow CEAs survive in vivo and sensitize the graft recipient for accelerated second-set rejection. These persistent cells may initiate an inflammatory response that may result in late graft breakdown and limit the utility of CEAs grown with a foreign fibroblast feeder layer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8676424     DOI: 10.1097/00005373-199607000-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma        ISSN: 0022-5282


  7 in total

1.  Expansion and long-term culture of differentiated normal rat urothelial cells in vitro.

Authors:  Y Y Zhang; B Ludwikowski; R Hurst; P Frey
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.416

2.  A hyaluronan hydrogel scaffold-based xeno-free culture system for ex vivo expansion of human corneal epithelial stem cells.

Authors:  D Chen; Y Qu; X Hua; L Zhang; Z Liu; S C Pflugfelder; D-Q Li
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Occurrence and control of sporadic proliferation in growth arrested Swiss 3T3 feeder cells.

Authors:  Rishi Man Chugh; Madhusudan Chaturvedi; Lakshmana Kumar Yerneni
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Regenerative Medicine of Epithelia: Lessons From the Past and Future Goals.

Authors:  Eleonora Maurizi; Davide Adamo; Federica Maria Magrelli; Giulia Galaverni; Eustachio Attico; Alessia Merra; Maria Benedetta Rizzarda Maffezzoni; Lorena Losi; Vincenzo Giuseppe Genna; Virginia Sceberras; Graziella Pellegrini
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2021-03-25

5.  Transgene-specific host responses in cutaneous gene therapy: the role of cells expressing the transgene.

Authors:  Z Zhang; C Kuscu; S Ghazizadeh
Journal:  Gene Ther       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 5.250

6.  A serum- and feeder-free technique of culturing human corneal epithelial stem cells on amniotic membrane.

Authors:  Kaevalin Lekhanont; Lulin Choubtum; Roy S Chuck; Tarinee Sa-ngiampornpanit; Varintorn Chuckpaiwong; Anun Vongthongsri
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 2.367

Review 7.  Tissue engineering in burn scar reconstruction.

Authors:  Ppm van Zuijlen; Klm Gardien; Meh Jaspers; E J Bos; D C Baas; Ajm van Trier; E Middelkoop
Journal:  Burns Trauma       Date:  2015-09-30
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.