Literature DB >> 8675850

Speechreading enhancement: a comparison of spatial-tactile display of voice fundamental frequency (F0) with auditory F0.

L Kishon-Rabin1, A Boothroyd, L Hanin.   

Abstract

In two experiments, subjects repeated video-recorded sentences presented via speechreading with and without enhancement by a sensory input derived from the acoustic speech signal. Enhancement was measured as percentage increase in recognized words. In experiment 1, tactile presentation of fundamental frequency (F0) provided, after training, for three of four postlingually deafened adults a mean enhancement of 11%. In experiment 2, using six hearing adults, the auditory presentation of F0 provided a mean enhancement of 50%. This value fell, but only to 37%, when the F0 signal was derived from the processor of the tactile aid used in experiment 1. From these experiments it can be concluded that the unexpectedly small enhancement found in experiment 1 is probably due both to the fact that this tactile aid was not providing effective access to all of the information available in the F0 contour and to limitations related to the tactile processing ability of the kinaesthetic system.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8675850     DOI: 10.1121/1.415885

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  9 in total

1.  Spatiotemporal dynamics of audiovisual speech processing.

Authors:  Lynne E Bernstein; Edward T Auer; Michael Wagner; Curtis W Ponton
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-08-31       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 2.  Fundamental frequency and speech intelligibility in background noise.

Authors:  Christopher A Brown; Sid P Bacon
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-09-11       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Achieving electric-acoustic benefit with a modulated tone.

Authors:  Christopher A Brown; Sid P Bacon
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 4.  Electro-Haptic Stimulation: A New Approach for Improving Cochlear-Implant Listening.

Authors:  Mark D Fletcher; Carl A Verschuur
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 4.677

5.  Multisensory training can promote or impede visual perceptual learning of speech stimuli: visual-tactile vs. visual-auditory training.

Authors:  Silvio P Eberhardt; Edward T Auer; Lynne E Bernstein
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Electro-haptic stimulation enhances speech recognition in spatially separated noise for cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Mark D Fletcher; Haoheng Song; Samuel W Perry
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Electro-Haptic Enhancement of Spatial Hearing in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Mark D Fletcher; Robyn O Cunningham; Sean R Mills
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Auditory Perceptual Learning for Speech Perception Can be Enhanced by Audiovisual Training.

Authors:  Lynne E Bernstein; Edward T Auer; Silvio P Eberhardt; Jintao Jiang
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-18       Impact factor: 4.677

9.  Vibro-Tactile Enhancement of Speech Intelligibility in Multi-talker Noise for Simulated Cochlear Implant Listening.

Authors:  Mark D Fletcher; Sean R Mills; Tobias Goehring
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.