Literature DB >> 8675849

A cross-language comparison of vowel perception in English-learning and German-learning infants.

L Polka1, O S Bohn.   

Abstract

Studies of cross-language consonant discrimination have shown a shift from a language-general to a language-specific pattern during the first year of life. Recently, the same pattern of change was observed for English-speaking infants' discrimination of two non-native vowel contrasts (Polka and Werker, 1994). The present study was designed to provide a more direct assessment of language-specific influences on infant vowel contrast perception. In experiment 1 adults were tested on a German (non-English) contrast, /dut/ versus /dyt/, and an English (non-German) contrast, /d epsilon t/ versus /daet/. English and German adults discriminated both contrasts with high levels of accuracy in a categorial AXB task. However, results of an identification and rating task showed that, within each non-native vowel contrast, one vowel perceptually matched a native vowel category better than the other. In experiment 2 discrimination of /dut/ versus /dyt/ and /d epsilon t/ versus /daet/ was examined in English- and German-learning infants in two age groups (6-8 months and 10-12 months) using the conditioned headturn procedure. English and German infants did not differ in their discrimination of either contrast and there were no age differences in discrimination of either contrast for the German or for the English infants. However, in both language groups at both ages, there were clear differences in performance related to the direction in which the vowel change was presented to the infants. For the German contrast, discrimination was significantly poorer when the contrast changed from /dut/ to /dyt/. For the English contrast, discrimination was significantly poorer when the contrast changed from /daet/ to /d epsilon t/. The directional asymmetries observed here and in other infant vowel studies point to a language-universal perceptual pattern which suggests that vowels produced with extreme articulatory postures serve as perceptual attractors in infant vowel perception.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8675849     DOI: 10.1121/1.415884

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  25 in total

1.  Discrimination of non-native consonant contrasts varying in perceptual assimilation to the listener's native phonological system.

Authors:  C T Best; G W McRoberts; E Goodell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Lexical competition in young children's word learning.

Authors:  Daniel Swingley; Richard N Aslin
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2006-10-18       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  On the assimilation-discrimination relationship in American English adults' French vowel learning.

Authors:  Erika S Levy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Learning Stimulus-Location Associations in 8- and 11-Month-Old Infants: Multimodal versus Unimodal Information.

Authors:  Sophie Ter Schure; Dorothy J Mandell; Paola Escudero; Maartje E J Raijmakers; Scott P Johnson
Journal:  Infancy       Date:  2014-09

5.  A new view of language acquisition.

Authors:  P K Kuhl
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-10-24       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Perceptual assimilation and discrimination of non-native vowel contrasts.

Authors:  Michael D Tyler; Catherine T Best; Alice Faber; Andrea G Levitt
Journal:  Phonetica       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 1.759

7.  Effects of the distribution of acoustic cues on infants' perception of sibilants.

Authors:  Alejandrina Cristià; Grant L McGuire; Amanda Seidl; Alexander L Francis
Journal:  J Phon       Date:  2011-07-01

8.  Perception of American English vowels by sequential Spanish-English bilinguals.

Authors:  Paula B García; Karen Froud
Journal:  Biling (Camb Engl)       Date:  2016-09-13

9.  Magnitude of phonetic distinction predicts success at early word learning in native and non-native accents.

Authors:  Paola Escudero; Catherine T Best; Christine Kitamura; Karen E Mulak
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-09-30

10.  Phonetic learning as a pathway to language: new data and native language magnet theory expanded (NLM-e).

Authors:  Patricia K Kuhl; Barbara T Conboy; Sharon Coffey-Corina; Denise Padden; Maritza Rivera-Gaxiola; Tobey Nelson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 6.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.