Literature DB >> 8674156

Antitumor activity of prolonged as compared with bolus administration of 2',2'-difluorodeoxycytidine in vivo against murine colon tumors.

G Veerman1, V W Ruiz van Haperen, J B Vermorken, P Noordhuis, B J Braakhuis, H M Pinedo, G J Peters.   

Abstract

2',2'-Difluorodeoxycytidine (gemcitabine) is a cytidine analogue with established antitumor activity against several experimental tumor types and against human ovarian and non-small-cell lung cancer. Both preclinical studies and most clinical trials involving patients with solid tumors have focused on short-term administration schedules; however, mechanistic studies indicate that a continuous-infusion schedule may be more effective. We determined the maximal tolerated dose (MTD) of gemcitabine in mice using various schedules. At these MTDs we observed considerably better antitumor activity of gemcitabine in two of three murine colon carcinoma lines using a prolonged administration as compared with a standard bolus protocol (i.p. 120 mg/kg q3d x 4). On the latter schedule, Colon 26-10 grown in BALB/c mice was the most sensitive tumor line, showing a growth-delay factor (GDF, number of doubling times gained by the treatment) of 6.7, whereas Colon 38 (grown in C57/B16 mice) was the least sensitive tumor, displaying a GDF of 0.9. Prolonged treatment (q3d x 6) of Colon 26-10 at a lower dose (100 mg/kg) enhanced the antitumor activity (GDF 9.6) while producing similar toxicity. A similar weight loss was found following the continuous infusion (c.i.) of gemcitabine using Alzet osmotic pumps s.c. for 3 or 7 days (2 mg/kg), but the GDF increased to 2.4 in Colon 38 (C57/B16) as compared with that provided by the bolus injections. Continuous infusion of gemcitabine at 15 mg/kg per 24 h q7d x 2 i.v. via the tail vein was more effective than bolus injection against Colon 26-10, with the GDF being > 17.7 and 73% of the tumors regressing completely. However, against Colon 38 tumors this schedule was not effective (GDF 0.4), even with a 25% higher dose. The plasma pharmacokinetics of gemcitabine was determined after one bolus dose (120 mg/kg). The peak concentration of gemcitabine was 225 microM and that of the deaminated catabolite 2',2'-difluorodeoxyuridine (dFdU) was 79 microM. The elimination of gemcitabine was much faster than that of dFdU, with the t1/2 beta values being 15 min and 8 h, respectively. For the c.i. schedules, plasma concentrations were below the detection limit of the assay (< 0.5 microM). Our results suggest that prolonged infusion of gemcitabine can give a better antitumor activity than bolus injections and shows promise of being active in clinical trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8674156     DOI: 10.1007/s002800050492

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol        ISSN: 0344-5704            Impact factor:   3.333


  15 in total

1.  Prolonged infusion gemcitabine: a clinical phase I study at low- (300 mg/m2) and high-dose (875 mg/m2) levels.

Authors:  C F Pollera; A Ceribelli; M Crecco; C Oliva; F Calabresi
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.850

Review 2.  Gemcitabine. A review of its pharmacology and clinical potential in non-small cell lung cancer and pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  S Noble; K L Goa
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Investigation into metastatic processes and the therapeutic effects of gemcitabine on human pancreatic cancer using an orthotopic SUIT-2 pancreatic cancer mouse model.

Authors:  Tamami Higuchi; Takehiko Yokobori; Tomoharu Naito; Chihaya Kakinuma; Shinji Hagiwara; Masahiko Nishiyama; Takayuki Asao
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-12-29       Impact factor: 2.967

4.  A phase I trial of gemcitabine administered as a 96-h continuous intravenous infusion in patients with advanced carcinoma and lymphoma.

Authors:  Lakshmi Rajdev; Gary Goldberg; Una Hopkins; Joseph A Sparano
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.064

5.  Gemcitabine as prolonged infusion and vinorelbine in anthracycline and/or taxane pretreated metastatic breast cancer: a phase II study.

Authors:  Peter Schmid; Volker Heilmann; Carsten-Oliver Schulz; Annette Dieing; Silvia Lehenbauer-Dehm; Christian Jehn; Orhan Sezer; Kurt Possinger; Bernd Flath
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-10-20       Impact factor: 4.553

6.  Prolonged infusion of gemcitabine in advanced solid tumors: a phase-I-study.

Authors:  Peter Schmid; Marcus Schweigert; Thomas Beinert; Bernd Flath; Orhan Sezer; Kurt Possinger
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.850

7.  Metronomic gemcitabine suppresses tumour growth, improves perfusion, and reduces hypoxia in human pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  K K Y Cham; J H E Baker; K S Takhar; J A Flexman; M Q Wong; D A Owen; A Yung; P Kozlowski; S A Reinsberg; E M Chu; C-W A Chang; A K Buczkowski; S W Chung; C H Scudamore; A I Minchinton; D T T Yapp; S S W Ng
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Low dose gemcitabine plus cisplatin in a weekly-based regimen as salvage therapy for relapsed breast cancer after taxane-anthracycline-containing regimens.

Authors:  R Sánchez-Escribano Morcuende; J E Alés-Martínez; P M Aramburo González
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.405

9.  Antiproliferative activity, mechanism of action and oral antitumor activity of CP-4126, a fatty acid derivative of gemcitabine, in in vitro and in vivo tumor models.

Authors:  Andries M Bergman; Auke D Adema; Jan Balzarini; Skjalg Bruheim; Iduna Fichtner; Paul Noordhuis; Oystein Fodstad; Finn Myhren; Marit L Sandvold; Hans R Hendriks; Godefridus J Peters
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 3.850

10.  Re-directing an alkylating agent to mitochondria alters drug target and cell death mechanism.

Authors:  Rida Mourtada; Sonali B Fonseca; Simon P Wisnovsky; Mark P Pereira; Xiaoming Wang; Rose Hurren; Jeremy Parfitt; Lesley Larsen; Robin A J Smith; Michael P Murphy; Aaron D Schimmer; Shana O Kelley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.