Literature DB >> 8673779

The use of propofol for sedation in the emergency department.

E R Swanson1, D C Seaberg, S Mathias.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of propofol and fentanyl when used by emergency physicians (EPs) for systemic sedation and analgesia in the ED.
METHODS: Over an eight-month period, a convenience sample of consenting patients at an urban teaching hospital ED who required sedation for painful procedures were enrolled in a descriptive study of therapeutic propofol sedation. After receiving 2 micrograms/kg of fentanyl i.v. the patients received a continuous infusion of propofol at 0.21 mg/kg/min i.v. to the desired level of sedation. A maintenance infusion of 3-6 mg/kg/hr was administered during the remainder of the procedure. Sedation time, total procedure time, and recovery time were recorded and the presence of side effects was noted. The patients and the physicians rated their satisfaction with the technique on a 100-mm visual analog scale. The patients were contacted at 24 hours for follow-up information.
RESULTS: Twenty patients (aged 19-62 years) received propofol infusion for procedures that included ten abscess incision and drainages, eight orthopedic reductions, one chest tube placement, and one wound exploration. The mean (+/- SD) total dose of propofol was 200 +/- 160 mg. The mean time to onset of sedation was 6.6 +/- 3.2 min, the mean procedure interval was 9.6 +/- 6.3 min, and the mean interval until recovery was 6.1 +/- 4.1 min. The median patient satisfaction score was 97 mm (range 40-100 mm); the median rating by physicians was 88 mm (range 4-100 mm). Side effects were noted in six patients: three had pain on injection, one had pain on injection and brief (< 1 min) hypotension (systolic blood pressure = 80 mm Hg), and two had apnea (< 30 sec). Seven patients had some recall of the procedure immediately afterwards, but only five had any recall at 24 hours. All 20 patients stated they would be willing to receive the same sedation again for a future procedure.
CONCLUSION: Propofol appears to be an effective agent to provide systemic sedation and analgesia when used in conjunction with fentanyl for procedures in the ED. Given its rapidity of onset and elimination, it may become a useful agent to EPs for i.v. sedation in the ED.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8673779     DOI: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1996.tb03426.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Emerg Med        ISSN: 1069-6563            Impact factor:   3.451


  10 in total

Review 1.  A review of the use of propofol for procedural sedation in the emergency department.

Authors:  L Symington; S Thakore
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 2.  Using continuous quantitative capnography for emergency department procedural sedation: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Nicholas Matthew Mohr; Andrew Stoltze; Azeemuddin Ahmed; Elizabeth Kiscaden; Dan Shane
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 3.397

3.  Effect of sedation on pain perception.

Authors:  Michael A Frölich; Kui Zhang; Timothy J Ness
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 7.892

4.  Recall after procedural sedation in the emergency department.

Authors:  Alex Swann; Jeffrey Williams; Daniel M Fatovich
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.740

5.  Impact of the United States propofol ban on emergency providers' procedural sedation agent choice and patient length of stay.

Authors:  Jonathan Pester; Joseph Robinson; John Prestosh; Suzanne Roozendaal; Rebecca Jeanmonod
Journal:  World J Emerg Med       Date:  2012

6.  Propofol for procedural sedation in the emergency department.

Authors:  Tamsin Dunn; David Mossop; Alastair Newton; Alison Gammon
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 7.  Capnography versus standard monitoring for emergency department procedural sedation and analgesia.

Authors:  Brian F Wall; Kirk Magee; Samuel G Campbell; Peter J Zed
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-03-23

Review 8.  Intravenous hypnotic regimens in patients with liver disease; a review article.

Authors:  Hassan Soleimanpour; Saeid Safari; Farzad Rahmani; Asghar Jafari Rouhi; Seyed Moayed Alavian
Journal:  Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2015-02-24

Review 9.  Current trends in intravenous sedative drugs for dental procedures.

Authors:  Ji-Young Yoon; Eun-Jung Kim
Journal:  J Dent Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2016-06-30

Review 10.  Incidence of Adverse Events in Adults Undergoing Procedural Sedation in the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  M Fernanda Bellolio; Waqas I Gilani; Patricia Barrionuevo; M Hassan Murad; Patricia J Erwin; Joel R Anderson; James R Miner; Erik P Hess
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 3.451

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.