Literature DB >> 8673318

Stress and strain distribution within the intact femur: compression or bending?

M E Taylor1, K E Tanner, M A Freeman, A L Yettram.   

Abstract

The aim of this research was to test the hypothesis that the intact femur is loaded predominately in compression. The study was composed of two parts: a finite element analysis of the intact femur to assess if a compressive stress distribution could be achieved in the diaphyseal region of the femur using physiological muscle and joint contact forces; a simple radiological study to assess the in vivo deflections of the femur during one legged stance. The results of this investigation strongly support the hypothesis that the femur is loaded primarily in compression, and not bending as previously thought. The finite element analysis demonstrated that a compressive stress distribution in the diaphyseal femur can be achieved, producing a stress distribution which appears to be consistent with the femoral cross-sectional geometry. The finite element analysis also predicted that for a compressive load case there would be negligible deflections of the femoral head. The radiological study confirmed this, with no measurable in vivo deflection of the femur occurring during one legged stance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8673318     DOI: 10.1016/1350-4533(95)00031-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Eng Phys        ISSN: 1350-4533            Impact factor:   2.242


  24 in total

1.  Biomechanics of bone-fracture fixation by stiffness-graded plates in comparison with stainless-steel plates.

Authors:  V K Ganesh; K Ramakrishna; Dhanjoo N Ghista
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2005-07-27       Impact factor: 2.819

2.  Healing of femoral fractures by the meaning of an innovative intramedullary nail.

Authors:  V Filardi
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2018-01-17

3.  Scaling of form and function in the xenarthran femur: a 100-fold increase in body mass is mitigated by repositioning of the third trochanter.

Authors:  Nick Milne; Paul O'Higgins
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  The effect of abductor muscle and anterior-posterior hip contact load simulation on the in-vitro primary stability of a cementless hip stem.

Authors:  Youngbae Park; Carolyne Albert; Yong-San Yoon; Göran Fernlund; Hanspeter Frei; Thomas R Oxland
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 2.359

5.  Differences in the mechanical behavior of cortical bone between compression and tension when subjected to progressive loading.

Authors:  Jeffry S Nyman; Huijie Leng; X Neil Dong; Xiaodu Wang
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2008-12-13

6.  Effects of age-related differences in femoral loading and bone mineral density on strains in the proximal femur during controlled walking.

Authors:  Dennis E Anderson; Michael L Madigan
Journal:  J Appl Biomech       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 1.833

7.  Prospects of implant with locking plate in fixation of subtrochanteric fracture: experimental demonstration of its potential benefits on synthetic femur model with supportive hierarchical nonlinear hyperelastic finite element analysis.

Authors:  Mohammed Hadi Latifi; Kunalan Ganthel; Shanmugam Rukmanikanthan; Azura Mansor; Tunku Kamarul; Mehmet Bilgen
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 2.819

8.  Compression or tension? The stress distribution in the proximal femur.

Authors:  K E Rudman; R M Aspden; J R Meakin
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2006-02-20       Impact factor: 2.819

9.  The underused hip in ipsilaterally orthotics-dependent children.

Authors:  Asser Sallam; Christian M Ziegler; Volkmar Jansson; Bernhard Heimkes
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2015-07-04       Impact factor: 1.548

10.  Influence of model complexity and problem formulation on the forces in the knee calculated using optimization methods.

Authors:  Chih-Chung Hu; Tung-Wu Lu; Sheng-Chang Chen
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 2.819

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.