Literature DB >> 8672737

Biliary strictures after liver transplantation: clinical picture, correlates and outcomes.

R B Feller1, R C Waugh, W S Selby, P M Dolan, A G Sheil, G W McCaughan.   

Abstract

We retrospectively examined 154 adults to ascertain the frequency, site of and pre-disposing factors for biliary strictures after liver transplantation, as well as their management and clinical outcome. Twenty patients (12.5%) were identified with biliary strictures; 16 were non-anastomotic and four were anastomotic strictures. The median time from transplantation to stricture diagnosis was 17 weeks (range 3-366). Of the 16 non-anastomotic strictures, six were intrahepatic, eight hilar and two extrahepatic (donor bile duct). A control group (n = 32) of patients transplanted immediately before and after index cases was used to examine for correlates in patients with non-anastomotic strictures. At the time of diagnosis in the non-anastomotic index cases, there was a higher incidence of: (i) biliary sludge (63 vs 0%; P < 0.001); and (ii) clinical cholangitis (75 vs 0%; P < 0.001) compared with controls. Primary sclerosing cholangitis was more often the diagnosis in index patients with non-anastomotic strictures compared with controls (31 vs 9%; P < 0.05). There were no differences between index patients and controls (non-anastomotic group) in ABO blood group non-identity, cold allograft ischaemia time, use of OKT3 (murine monoclonal antibody to CD3) and hepatic artery thrombosis. Of 15 patients treated with balloon dilatation, seven required stent insertion although none have required surgery. As determined by liver function tests, there was evidence of persisting graft dysfunction in index patients compared with controls (SAP 381 vs 112 U/L, P < 0.001; GGT 529 vs 80 U/L, P < 0.001), but there was no difference in survival during a median follow-up time of 16 months (range: 3-48 months) from stricture diagnosis. In conclusion, biliary strictures tend to occur within 6 months of transplantation and are an important cause of ongoing graft dysfunction. Non-anastomotic strictures were more common in patients requiring transplantation for primary sclerosing cholangitis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8672737     DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.1996.tb00005.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 0815-9319            Impact factor:   4.029


  7 in total

Review 1.  Liver transplantation in the UK.

Authors:  S R Bramhall; E Minford; B Gunson; J A Buckels
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Interventional radiology: management of biliary complications of liver transplantation.

Authors:  Nishita Kothary; Aalpen A Patel; Richard D Shlansky-Goldberg
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.513

3.  Treating Biliary-Enteric Anastomotic Strictures with Enteroscopy-ERCP Requires Fewer Procedures than Percutaneous Transhepatic Biliary Drains.

Authors:  Hazem Hammad; Brian C Brauer; Maximiliano Smolkin; Robert Ryu; Joshua Obuch; Raj J Shah
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2019-05-25       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury and Ischemic-Type Biliary Lesions following Liver Transplantation.

Authors:  Raffaele Cursio; Jean Gugenheim
Journal:  J Transplant       Date:  2012-02-29

5.  Delayed rearterialization unlikely leads to nonanastomotic stricture but causes temporary injury on bile duct after liver transplantation.

Authors:  Yang Liu; Jiazhong Wang; Peng Yang; Hongwei Lu; Le Lu; Jinlong Wang; Hua Li; Yanxia Duan; Jun Wang; Yiming Li
Journal:  Transpl Int       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 3.782

6.  Chemokine Receptor-5Delta32 Mutation is No Risk Factor for Ischemic-Type Biliary Lesion in Liver Transplantation.

Authors:  Christoph Heidenhain; Gero Puhl; Christian Moench; Anja Lautem; Peter Neuhaus
Journal:  J Transplant       Date:  2009-03-30

7.  New diagnosis and therapy model for ischemic-type biliary lesions following liver transplantation--a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Ying-cai Zhang; En-ze Qu; Jie Ren; Qi Zhang; Rong-qin Zheng; Yang Yang; Gui-hua Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.