Literature DB >> 8672615

[Differential administration of non-opioids in postoperative analgesia, I. Quantification of the analgesic effect of metamizole using patient-controlled analgesia].

P Steffen1, I Schuhmacher, T Weichel, M Georgieff, W Seeling.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate: 1. Whether the perioperative administration of metamizol causes a significant reduction in postoperative opioid requirements within the first 24 h after surgery. 2. The opioid-sparing effect after different types of operations. 3. Whether preoperative application of metamizol causes a significant reduction of the pain-score immediately after operation.
METHODS: In a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled study, 117 patients, scheduled for minor orthopaedic or laparoscopic surgery or other operations (mainly resection of the thyroid gland and inguinal herniotomies) received either metamizol (1 g/100 ml NaCl 0.9%) or placebo (100 ml NaCl 0.9%) intravenously over 15 min in three separate doses: the first dose was given just before induction and the others 6 h and 12 h later. After surgery all patients were allowed to self-administer buprenorphine from a PCA (patient-controlled analgesia) pump (Bolus: 30 microgram, lockout: 5 min in the recovery room, 30 min on the ward). Every hour for the first 6 h and after 24 h, cumulated doses of buprenorphine, pain scores (0-10), blood pressure, pulse and side effects were recorded.
RESULTS: After minor orthopaedic and laparoscopic surgery, metamizol-treated patients had significantly less pain immediately after surgery and used a significantly lower cumulated dose of opioid in the first 24 h after surgery (-20% and -67% respectively) than patients receiving placebo. After the other types of surgery no analgesic effect could be established.
CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative administration of metamizol results in better pain relief and significantly lower buprenorphine requirements particularly after laparoscopic operations. To achieve a significant pain reduction immediately after the operation, the first dose should be applied before induction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8672615     DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-995890

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther        ISSN: 0939-2661            Impact factor:   0.698


  5 in total

1.  [How organized acute pain therapy in Germany began].

Authors:  C Maier; H Wulf
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.107

Review 2.  [Combined analgesics for postoperative pain therapy. Review of effectivity and side-effects].

Authors:  H Lange; P Kranke; P Steffen; T Steinfeldt; H Wulf; L H J Eberhart
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 3.  Drug interactions with patient-controlled analgesia.

Authors:  Jorn Lotsch; Carsten Skarke; Irmgard Tegeder; Gerd Geisslinger
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 6.447

4.  [Postoperative analgesia with rofecoxib. How effective is the preoperative application of a 25 mg dose?].

Authors:  P Steffen; M Krell; W Seeling
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 1.107

5.  Preventive Analgesia, Hemodynamic Stability, and Pain in Vitreoretinal Surgery.

Authors:  Michał Jan Stasiowski; Aleksandra Pluta; Anita Lyssek-Boroń; Magdalena Kawka; Lech Krawczyk; Ewa Niewiadomska; Dariusz Dobrowolski; Robert Rejdak; Seweryn Król; Jakub Żak; Izabela Szumera; Anna Missir; Przemysław Jałowiecki; Beniamin Oskar Grabarek
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 2.430

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.