Literature DB >> 8672181

The impact of a preconceptional health promotion program on intendedness of pregnancy.

M K Moos1, S I Bangdiwala, A R Meibohm, R C Cefalo.   

Abstract

The objective for this study was to determine whether a brief preconceptional health promotion program for low-income women attending family planning clinics impacts on intendedness of pregnancy. In this prospective study, we examined data on 1378 women presenting for prenatal care at three local health departments. Each of the departments offers a standardized preconceptional health promotion program in its family planning clinics. Comparisons were undertaken for 456 women who had been exposed to the family planning preconception program, 309 women who had attended the family planning clinics but had not been exposed to the program, and 613 women who were unknown to the health department before beginning prenatal care. Women exposed to information on preconceptional health during routine family planning visits, the experimental group, had a 51.8% (p = 0.064) greater likelihood of identifying their pregnancies at intended than a group known to the local health departments' family planning programs but unexposed to the intervention. Furthermore, the experimental group had a 64.2% (p = 0.0009) greater likelihood of intendedness than a comparison group not known to the health departments before the initiation of prenatal care. Our study indicates that an introductory program of preconceptional health promotion which is targeted to women not planning a pregnancy in the immediate future is associated with a higher rate of intendedness in subsequent pregnancies. Expansion of similar preconceptional programs in family planning clinics may prove a useful approach for promoting intendedness of pregnancy in low-income women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8672181     DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-994302

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Perinatol        ISSN: 0735-1631            Impact factor:   1.862


  15 in total

Review 1.  Preconception care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Carol C Korenbrot; Alycia Steinberg; Catherine Bender; Sydne Newberry
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2002-06

2.  Correlates of partner-specific condom use intentions among incarcerated women in Rhode Island.

Authors:  Cynthia Rosengard; Jennifer G Clarke; Kristen DaSilva; Megan Hebert; Jennifer Rose; Michael D Stein
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2005-03

3.  Improving birth control service utilization by offering services prerelease vs postincarceration.

Authors:  Jennifer G Clarke; Cynthia Rosengard; Jennifer S Rose; Megan R Hebert; Jeffrey Peipert; Michael D Stein
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-03-29       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Reproductive health care and family planning needs among incarcerated women.

Authors:  Jennifer G Clarke; Megan R Hebert; Cynthia Rosengard; Jennifer S Rose; Kristen M DaSilva; Michael D Stein
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-03-29       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  The Link Between Reproductive Life Plan Assessment And Provision of Preconception Care At Publicly Funded Health Centers.

Authors:  Cheryl L Robbins; Loretta Gavin; Marion W Carter; Susan B Moskosky
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2017-05-05

6.  Core state preconception health indicators: a voluntary, multi-state selection process.

Authors:  Danielle L Broussard; William B Sappenfield; Chris Fussman; Charlan D Kroelinger; Violanda Grigorescu
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2011-02

Review 7.  Preconception healthcare delivery at a population level: construction of public health models of preconception care.

Authors:  Geordan D Shannon; Corinna Alberg; Luis Nacul; Nora Pashayan
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2014-08

8.  Motherhood preconceived: the emergence of the Preconception Health and Health Care Initiative.

Authors:  Miranda R Waggoner
Journal:  J Health Polit Policy Law       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 2.265

9.  Preconception counselling initiated by general practitioners in the Netherlands: reaching couples contemplating pregnancy [ISRCTN53942912].

Authors:  J Elsinga; Km van der Pal-de Bruin; S le Cessie; Lc de Jong-Potjer; Sp Verloove-Vanhorick; Wjj Assendelft
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2006-07-07       Impact factor: 2.497

10.  Motivational interviewing with computer assistance as an intervention to empower women to make contraceptive choices while incarcerated: study protocol for randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jennifer Clarke; Melanie A Gold; Rachel E Simon; Mary B Roberts; Lar Stein
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2012-07-02       Impact factor: 2.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.