BACKGROUND: The compensatory increase in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and effective renal plasma flow (ERPF) which follows a reduction in renal mass may be mediated by growth hormone, a renal vasodilator. METHODS: GFR, ERPF and glomerular morphometry were assessed in the dwarf rat, selectively deficient in GH, and compared its Lewis base strain. Studies were performed 21-days after sham-operation, unilateral nephrectomy or subtotal nephrectomy in age-matched animals. GFR and ERPF were assessed from the renal clearance of inulin and p-aminohippurate measured under barbiturate anaesthesia. RESULTS: The dwarf rat had a lower GFR and ERPF than the Lewis rat, in proportion to its lower body weight and lower kidney weight. Kidneys from the dwarf rat had a similar number of glomeruli to the Lewis, but smaller glomerular components in proportion to a lower kidney weight. Following unilateral nephrectomy, GFR (dwarf + 58%, Lewis + 53%) and ERPF (dwarf + 58%, Lewis + 52%) increased to a similar degree in both rat strains. Glomerular diameter, volume and capillary surface area increased in proportion to kidney growth, although compensatory renal growth (dwarf + 62%, Lewis + 78%) was somewhat lower in the dwarf. Following 5/6 subtotal nephrectomy, GFR (dwarf + 143%, Lewis + 171%) increased to a similar degree in both rat strains while ERPF (dwarf + 108%, Lewis + 48%) and compensatory renal growth (dwarf + 115%, Lewis + 86%) were greater in the dwarf than the Lewis rat. Subtotal nephrectomy was also associated with an increase in the thickness of the glomerular basement membrane in both rat strains. CONCLUSIONS: The results do not support a role for GH in the compensatory increase in renal function or hypertrophy which follows a reduction in renal mass, excluding this as a potential mechanism for GH-dependent renal scarring.
BACKGROUND: The compensatory increase in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and effective renal plasma flow (ERPF) which follows a reduction in renal mass may be mediated by growth hormone, a renal vasodilator. METHODS: GFR, ERPF and glomerular morphometry were assessed in the dwarf rat, selectively deficient in GH, and compared its Lewis base strain. Studies were performed 21-days after sham-operation, unilateral nephrectomy or subtotal nephrectomy in age-matched animals. GFR and ERPF were assessed from the renal clearance of inulin and p-aminohippurate measured under barbiturate anaesthesia. RESULTS: The dwarf rat had a lower GFR and ERPF than the Lewis rat, in proportion to its lower body weight and lower kidney weight. Kidneys from the dwarf rat had a similar number of glomeruli to the Lewis, but smaller glomerular components in proportion to a lower kidney weight. Following unilateral nephrectomy, GFR (dwarf + 58%, Lewis + 53%) and ERPF (dwarf + 58%, Lewis + 52%) increased to a similar degree in both rat strains. Glomerular diameter, volume and capillary surface area increased in proportion to kidney growth, although compensatory renal growth (dwarf + 62%, Lewis + 78%) was somewhat lower in the dwarf. Following 5/6 subtotal nephrectomy, GFR (dwarf + 143%, Lewis + 171%) increased to a similar degree in both rat strains while ERPF (dwarf + 108%, Lewis + 48%) and compensatory renal growth (dwarf + 115%, Lewis + 86%) were greater in the dwarf than the Lewis rat. Subtotal nephrectomy was also associated with an increase in the thickness of the glomerular basement membrane in both rat strains. CONCLUSIONS: The results do not support a role for GH in the compensatory increase in renal function or hypertrophy which follows a reduction in renal mass, excluding this as a potential mechanism for GH-dependent renal scarring.
Authors: Colin R Lenihan; Stephan Busque; Geraldine Derby; Kristina Blouch; Bryan D Myers; Jane C Tan Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2015-02-17 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Andrew Advani; Kim A Connelly; Darren A Yuen; Yanling Zhang; Suzanne L Advani; Judy Trogadis; M Golam Kabir; Etai Shachar; Michael A Kuliszewski; Howard Leong-Poi; Duncan J Stewart; Richard E Gilbert Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-10-03 Impact factor: 3.240