Literature DB >> 8671442

Unexpected low oxygen tension of intravaginal culture.

M Fukuda1, K Fukuda, C Ranoux.   

Abstract

The goal of this study was to assess whether the metabolic activity of gametes or the local environment had a greater influence on the pH, pO2 and pCO2 of the culture medium in the intravaginal culture (IVC) technique. The pH, pO2 and pCO2 of the culture medium in four groups of intravaginal cryotubes with or without spermatozoa and oocytes, together with the pO2 and pCO2 of vaginal epithelium, were measured before and 48 h after IVC. Hermetically closed cryotubes sealed in a cryoflex envelope were used throughout. Similar results were obtained from all four groups. The pH and pCO2 were unchanged but pO2 significantly decreased during IVC, presumably because of equilibration with the low pO2 (5 mmHg) and pCO2 (49 mmHg) present in the vaginal epithelium. A second series of experiments was then performed with standard culture conditions using culture medium with or without motile spermatozoa in cryotubes covered with cryoflex maintained in air supplemented with 5% CO2. The pH, pO2 and pCO2 were all unchanged in all samples. When the samples were maintained in air only, the pH increased, pO2 remained unchanged and pCO2 decreased, presumably because of equilibration with the low pCO2 (0. 3 mmHg) present in the air. However, when the samples were cultured under venous blood, the pH and pO2 decreased and pCO2 increased, presumably because of the high pCO2 and low pH of venous blood. Thus the pO2 and pCO2 of the culture medium were able to equilibrate with the local environmental gas milieu owing to the permeability of O2 and CO2 through the plastic material. IVC results in a constant pH due to an identical pCO2 in the vaginal epithelium but in a reduced pO2 concentration due to the lower pO2 in the vaginal epithelium.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8671442     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019374

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  5 in total

1.  INVO procedure: minimally invasive IVF as an alternative treatment option for infertile couples.

Authors:  Elkin Lucena; Angela M Saa; Doris E Navarro; Carlos Pulido; Oscar Lombana; Abby Moran
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2012-05-02

2.  In Vivo Culture System Using the INVOcell Device Shows Similar Pregnancy and Implantation Rates to Those Obtained from In Vivo Culture System in ICSI Procedures.

Authors:  Javier García-Ferreyra; Roly Hilario; Daniel Luna; Lucy Villegas; Rocío Romero; Patricia Zavala; Julio Dueñas-Chacón
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Reprod Health       Date:  2015-06-10

3.  Hijacking Sexual Immuno-Privilege in GBM-An Immuno-Evasion Strategy.

Authors:  Martyn A Sharpe; David S Baskin; Amanda V Jenson; Alexandra M Baskin
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-10-12       Impact factor: 5.923

4.  Comparison of Treatment Outcomes among Sibling Oocytes Using Different Culture Systems-Conventional IVF versus INVOcell Device-And Evaluation of INVOcell User Satisfaction: The INVOcIVF Study.

Authors:  Wan Syahirah Yang Mohsin; Nor Shaireen Abdullah Chue; Fazilah Abdul Hamid; Muhammad Azrai Abu; Sukhilmi Othman; Norazilah Mat Jin; Shu Yuan Woon; Abdul Kadir Abdul Karim; Mohd Faizal Ahmad
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 4.614

5.  Comparing blastocyst quality and live birth rates of intravaginal culture using INVOcell™ to traditional in vitro incubation in a randomized open-label prospective controlled trial.

Authors:  Kevin J Doody; E Jason Broome; Kathleen M Doody
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 3.412

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.