Literature DB >> 8671425

The effect of human menopausal gonadotrophin and highly purified, urine-derived follicle stimulating hormone on the outcome of in-vitro fertilization in down-regulated normogonadotrophic women.

L G Westergaard1, K Erb, S Laursen, P E Rasmussen, S Rex.   

Abstract

It has been suggested that the luteinizing hormone (LH) activity of human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG) preparations used for ovarian stimulation in in-vitro fertilization (IVF) may have adverse effects on reproductive outcome. In the present prospective, randomized trial of 218 infertile couples this notion was investigated. A total of 114 women were treated with Pergonal (HMG group) and 104 with Fertinorm HP (HP-FSH group). The two groups were comparable with regard to duration of infertility, cause of infertility, age and number of previous IVF attempts and all had normal basal gonadotrophin concentrations before treatment was started. A standard hormonal treatment consisting of pituitary down-regulation with gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogue (GnRHa) for 14 days starting on cycle day 21, followed by either HMG or highly purified follicle stimulating hormone (HP-FSH), three ampoules (225 IU) per day for 7 days, was used in all cases. The daily hormone dose was thereafter individualized according to the ovarian response. A maximum of two pre-embryos were transferred after 3 days of culture. Luteal support with progesterone (300 mg per day intravaginally) was used in all cases. Serum concentrations of oestradiol, FSH and LH were measured on days 1 and 8 of stimulation and on the day of oocyte retrieval. The mean number of days of stimulation, mean number of ampoules of HMG or HP-FSH used, mean total motile sperm count on the day of oocyte retrieval and mean numbers of oocytes retrieved (13.4 versus 13.7) or pre-embryos transferred (1.8 versus 1.8) were similar for both groups. Significantly (P < 0.05) more cycles in the HP-FSH group (17 = 16%) were cancelled due to complete failure of fertilization than in the HMG group (7 = 6%). The mean fertilization rate was significantly (P < 0.05) higher in the HMG group (56%) than in the HP-FSH group (50%), and significantly more transferable pre-embryos were obtained in the HMG than in the HP-FSH group (mean: 4.0 versus 3.2; P < 0.01). Serum hormone concentrations were similar to the two groups on stimulation day 1, but differed significantly with regard to FSH, LH and oestradiol on stimulation day 8. The clinical outcome was similar in the two groups, with an ongoing pregnancy rate (> 12 weeks of gestation) per started cycle of 33% in the HMG group and 29% in the HP-FSH group. The clinical abortion rates were similar (10 and 14%), and the implantation rate was 30% in each group. In conclusion, no detrimental effect of the LH activity of HMG on the clinical outcome of IVF in GnRHa down-regulated normogonadotrophic women was found. To the contrary, some beneficial effects of HMG on fertilization rates and pre-embryo development as compared with HP-FSH were demonstrated. These effects, as well as the differences in serum hormone concentrations during ovarian stimulation, may be caused by differences in LH content and/or in the composition of FSH isoforms of the HMG and HP-FSH preparations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8671425     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019357

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  11 in total

1.  The Ideal Stimulation Protocol: Is There One?

Authors:  Gautam N Allahbadia
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2015-07-01

2.  A randomized prospective cross-over study of highly purified follicle-stimulating hormone and human menopausal gonadotrophin for ovarian hyperstimulation in women aged 37-41 years.

Authors:  S Bassil; C Wyns; J Donnez
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Reduced in vitro fertilization of human oocytes correlates with raised circulating FSH levels during ovarian stimulation in normogonadotropic women downregulated with GnRH-analogues.

Authors:  C Y Andersen; L G Westergaard; A G Byskov; K Erb
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Requirements for human chorionic gonadotropin and recombinant human luteinizing hormone for follicular development and maturation.

Authors:  C Y Andersen; S Ziebe; X Guoliang; A G Byskov
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Intracytoplasmic sperm injection after follicle stimulation with highly purified human follicle-stimulating hormone compared with human menopausal gonadotropin.

Authors:  A Weissman; J Meriano; S Ward; L Gotlieb; R F Casper
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Mild/minimal stimulation protocol for ovarian stimulation of patients at high risk of developing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome.

Authors:  L Rinaldi; F Lisi; H Selman
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 4.256

7.  Low dose gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist treatments with early discontinuation for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in an in vitro fertilization program.

Authors:  Su-Long Lee; Jinu-Hwang Su; Katsuo Ikuta; Kaoru Suzumori
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2003-03-25

8.  Results from adding recombinant LH for assisted reproductive technology treatment: A randomized control trial.

Authors:  Mohammad-Hossein Razi; Fereshteh Mohseni; Razieh Dehghani Firouzabadi; Sima Janati; Nahid Yari; Sahabeh Etebary
Journal:  Iran J Reprod Med       Date:  2014-02

9.  "hCG priming" effect in controlled ovarian stimulation through a long protocol.

Authors:  Panagiotis Beretsos; George A Partsinevelos; Eleni Arabatzi; Peter Drakakis; Depy Mavrogianni; Elli Anagnostou; Kostas Stefanidis; Aris Antsaklis; Dimitris Loutradis
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2009-08-31       Impact factor: 5.211

10.  ESHRE guideline: ovarian stimulation for IVF/ICSI.

Authors:  The Eshre Guideline Group On Ovarian Stimulation; Ernesto Bosch; Simone Broer; Georg Griesinger; Michael Grynberg; Peter Humaidan; Estratios Kolibianakis; Michal Kunicki; Antonio La Marca; George Lainas; Nathalie Le Clef; Nathalie Massin; Sebastiaan Mastenbroek; Nikolaos Polyzos; Sesh Kamal Sunkara; Tanya Timeva; Mira Töyli; Janos Urbancsek; Nathalie Vermeulen; Frank Broekmans
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2020-05-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.