Literature DB >> 8670334

Pediatric rheumatology in adult rheumatology practices in Washington state.

D D Sherry1, C A Wallace, S J Kahn.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine both the extent to which adult rheumatologists treat children and their level of comfort in doing so.
METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to all 77 physicians in the state of Washington who were listed as adult rheumatologists in the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) directory.
RESULTS: Sixty-six questionnaires (86%) were returned; 50 were identified as being from private-practicing adult rheumatologists and were the focus of this study. Sixty-two percent of the respondents reported that they care for children; predictors included increased exposure to pediatric rheumatology during fellowship (P = 0.003), increased distance from Seattle (P = 0.001), and listing oneself in the ACR directory as treating children (P = 0.03). Most respondents reported feeling discomfort in treating children younger than 6 years of age, treating Kawasaki disease, and treating polyarteritis nodosa, but most reported feeling comfortable treating children with chronic arthritides. Impediments to referring to a pediatric rheumatologist included distance (median distance 35 miles), convenience for the family, personal preference, and experience in caring for children. Twenty-nine percent reported difficulties referring to a pediatric rheumatologist outside of one's managed care plan. Adult rheumatologists expressed interest in continuing medical education dealing with pediatric rheumatology, preferably with a lecture format in their home communities.
CONCLUSION: A significant number of adult rheumatologists care for children. Pediatric rheumatologists should provide both educational and consultative support for these adult rheumatologist colleagues.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8670334     DOI: 10.1002/art.1780390722

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthritis Rheum        ISSN: 0004-3591


  6 in total

1.  Prescribing for Children With Rheumatic Disease: Perceived Treatment Approaches Between Pediatric and Adult Rheumatologists.

Authors:  Heather van Mater; Stephen J Balevic; Gary L Freed; Sarah J Clark
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 4.794

Review 2.  Interspecialty differences in the care of children with chronic or serious acute conditions: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Michelle L Mayer; Asheley Cockrell Skinner; Gary L Freed
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 4.406

3.  Policy challenges for the pediatric rheumatology workforce: Part I. Education and economics.

Authors:  Michael Henrickson
Journal:  Pediatr Rheumatol Online J       Date:  2011-08-16       Impact factor: 3.054

4.  Employment of a needs assessment survey to shape a novel web-based pediatric rheumatology curriculum for primary care providers.

Authors:  Amy Louise Woodward; Zena Leah Harris
Journal:  Pediatr Rheumatol Online J       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 3.054

5.  Barriers and alternatives to pediatric rheumatology referrals: survey of general pediatricians in the United States.

Authors:  Colleen K Correll; Logan G Spector; Lei Zhang; Bryce A Binstadt; Richard K Vehe
Journal:  Pediatr Rheumatol Online J       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 3.054

6.  Prescription patterns for children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis in Michigan Medicaid: a comparison by prescriber type.

Authors:  Meredith P Riebschleger; Heather A Van Mater; Lisa M Cohn; Sarah J Clark
Journal:  Pediatr Rheumatol Online J       Date:  2014-09-05       Impact factor: 3.054

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.