Literature DB >> 8669573

Analysis of 1500 laryngeal mask uses by one anaesthetist in adults undergoing routine anaesthesia.

J Brimacombe1.   

Abstract

An analysis of 1500 laryngeal mask airway uses by one anaesthetist using the standard insertion technique was conducted to determine successful insertion rates, position by fibreoptic larynoscopy, complication rates and whether there is a long-term learning curve. The correlation between laryngeal mask airway placement and modified Mallampati grade was also determined. The first time insertion rate was 95.5% with an overall failure rate after three attempts of 0.4%. One hundred and fifteen patients were Mallampati III or IV. All failed placements were Mallampati I or II. Problems occurred in 94 patients (6.27%), but oxygen saturation decreased below 90% on only ten occasions and below 80% on one occasion. There were no episodes of regurgitation. The vocal cords were visible from the mask aperture bars in 97.1%. Comparison of insertion rates, fibreoptic position and complications for the first and second 750 insertions provides evidence for a 'long' term learning curve. These data could be used as a guide for 'optimal' or expected successful laryngeal mask airway insertion rates in adults undergoing routine anaesthesia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8669573     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1996.tb07660.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesia        ISSN: 0003-2409            Impact factor:   6.955


  13 in total

1.  Developing the skill of laryngeal mask insertion: prospective single center study.

Authors:  S Mohr; M A Weigand; S Hofer; E Martin; A Gries; A Walther; M Bernhard
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  Rapid sequence induction in the emergency department: a strategy for failure.

Authors:  S D Carley; C Gwinnutt; J Butler; I Sammy; P Driscoll
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 3.  ProSeal versus Classic laryngeal mask airway (LMA) for positive pressure ventilation in adults undergoing elective surgery.

Authors:  Muhammad Qamarul Hoda; Khalid Samad; Hameed Ullah
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-07-20

4.  The advantages of the LMA over the tracheal tube or facemask: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  J Brimacombe
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 5.063

5.  Negative pressure pulmonary oedema following use of ProSeal LMA.

Authors:  Richa Jain; Mahendra Kumar; Zainab A Haq; Ashim Banerjee
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2013-03

6.  The new perilaryngeal airway (CobraPLA) is as efficient as the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) but provides better airway sealing pressures.

Authors:  Ozan Akça; Anupama Wadhwa; Papiya Sengupta; Jaleel Durrani; Keith Hanni; Mary Wenke; Yüksel Yücel; Rainer Lenhardt; Anthony G Doufas; Daniel I Sessler
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 6.627

7.  The Availability of Advanced Airway Equipment and Experience with Videolaryngoscopy in the UK: Two UK Surveys.

Authors:  Rachel L Gill; Audrey S Y Jeffrey; Alistair F McNarry; Geoffrey H C Liew
Journal:  Anesthesiol Res Pract       Date:  2015-01-05

8.  Efficacy of the New Perilaryngeal Airway (CobraPLA™) Versus the Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA™) to Improve Oropharyngeal Leak Pressure in Obese and Overweight Patients.

Authors:  Siamak Yaghoobi; Seyed Mohamadreza Abootorabi; Hamid Kayalha; Tom C Van Zundert; Amir H Pakpour
Journal:  Tanaffos       Date:  2015

9.  Parapharyngeal abscess following use of a laryngeal mask airway during open revision septorhinoplasty.

Authors:  Benjamin van der Woerd; Jeff Robichaud; Michael Gupta
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2015-10-17

10.  A comparative study among normal saline, water soluble gel and 2% lidocaine gel as a SLIPA lubricant.

Authors:  Pyung-Gul Park; Geun Joo Choi; Won Joong Kim; So-Young Yang; Hwa-Yong Shin; Hyun Kang; Chong Wha Baek; Yong Hun Jung; Jin-Yun Kim; Min-Su Kang
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2014-02-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.