PURPOSE: To assess the benefit of active physician involvement in ultrasound (US) examinations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Concordance of findings by technologists and physicians was assessed prospectively for examinations of 1,510 consecutive patients who underwent US during regular working hours. RESULTS: Overall concordance was generally good (74%). However, in cases in which a major or minor new diagnosis was made from the US scan, concordance rates were substantially lower (36% and 32%, respectively). Agreement varied with the type of examination. The discordance rate for obstetric examinations (17%) was only half that for abdominal and pelvic examinations (31%). Concordance improved with increasing years of experience of the technologist. CONCLUSION: An active role of physicians in the overall conduct of US examinations is essential to optimize provision of a complete, accurate report.
PURPOSE: To assess the benefit of active physician involvement in ultrasound (US) examinations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Concordance of findings by technologists and physicians was assessed prospectively for examinations of 1,510 consecutive patients who underwent US during regular working hours. RESULTS: Overall concordance was generally good (74%). However, in cases in which a major or minor new diagnosis was made from the US scan, concordance rates were substantially lower (36% and 32%, respectively). Agreement varied with the type of examination. The discordance rate for obstetric examinations (17%) was only half that for abdominal and pelvic examinations (31%). Concordance improved with increasing years of experience of the technologist. CONCLUSION: An active role of physicians in the overall conduct of US examinations is essential to optimize provision of a complete, accurate report.
Authors: Matthew J Bassignani; Samuel J Dwyer; Jonathan M Ciambotti; Juan M Olazagasti; Ruth Moran; Sean Moynihan; Alfred C Weaver; Andrew M Snyder Journal: J Digit Imaging Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 4.056