Literature DB >> 8668510

The optimum decision rules for the oddity task.

N J Versfeld1, H Dai, D M Green.   

Abstract

This paper presents the optimum decision rule for an m-interval oddity task in which m-1 intervals contain the same signal and one is different or odd. The optimum decision rule depends on the degree of correlation among observations. The present approach unifies the different strategies that occur with "roved" or "fixed" experiments (Macmillan & Creelman, 1991, p. 147). It is shown that the commonly used decision rule for an m-interval oddity task corresponds to the special case of highly correlated observations. However, as is also true for the same-different paradigm, there exists a different optimum decision rule when the observations are independent. The relation between the probability of a correct response and d' is derived for the three-interval oddity task. Tables are presented of this relation for the three-, four-, and five-interval oddity task. Finally, an experimental method is proposed that allows one to determine the decision rule used by the observer in an oddity experiment.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8668510     DOI: 10.3758/bf03205470

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  6 in total

1.  Spectral weights in profile listening.

Authors:  B G Berg; D M Green
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  A table of d' for M-alternative odd-man-out forced-choice procedures.

Authors:  B J Craven
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-04

3.  The optimum decision rules in the same-different paradigm.

Authors:  H Dai; N J Versfeld; D M Green
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-01

4.  Towards a model for discrimination of broadband signals.

Authors:  N I Durlach; L D Braida; Y Ito
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Frequency discrimination as a function of frequency and sensation level.

Authors:  C C Wier; W Jesteadt; D M Green
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Relative estimates of combination weights, decision criteria, and internal noise based on correlation coefficients.

Authors:  V M Richards; S Zhu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 1.840

  6 in total
  5 in total

1.  Evidence of across-channel processing for spectral-ripple discrimination in cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Jong Ho Won; Gary L Jones; Ward R Drennan; Elyse M Jameyson; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  The optimum decision rules in the same-different paradigm.

Authors:  H Dai; N J Versfeld; D M Green
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-01

3.  On the choice of adequate randomization ranges for limiting the use of unwanted cues in same-different, dual-pair, and oddity tasks.

Authors:  Huanping Dai; Christophe Micheyl
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Likelihood ratio, optimal decision rules, and relationship between proportion correct and d' in the dual-pair AB-versus-BA identification paradigm.

Authors:  Christophe Micheyl; Huanping Dai
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Some Memories are Odder than Others: Judgments of Episodic Oddity Violate Known Decision Rules.

Authors:  Akira R O'Connor; Emily N Guhl; Justin C Cox; Ian G Dobbins
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.059

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.