Literature DB >> 8667975

Cost utility of the multichannel cochlear implants in 258 profoundly deaf individuals.

J R Wyatt1, J K Niparko, M Rothman, G deLissovoy.   

Abstract

Cost utility analysis is a method of cost-effectiveness analysis which provides results in terms of cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). Cost utility for the multichannel cochlear implant was calculated using Ontario Health Utilities Index data from 229 Nucleus 22-channel implant users and 32 cochlear implant candidates awaiting surgery. The health utility of the implanted group was greater than that of the candidate group by 0.204 (P<.0001). Use of this figure in a cost utility calculation indicates that cochlear implantation costs approximately $15,928 per QALY provided. Sensitivity analysis, a technique which systematically varies the assumptions underlying the calculations, suggests a range for the true value of between $12,000 and $30,000. This compares very favorably with other medical interventions. It is concluded that profound hearing loss has a significant effect on quality of life, and measurement of the changes that result from cochlear implant use indicates that this technology provides significant improvements and is quite cost-effective.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8667975     DOI: 10.1097/00005537-199607000-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  15 in total

1.  Adjusting distributions of the Health Utilities Index Mark 3 utility scores of health-related quality of life.

Authors:  Jian Sun
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 2.  The multiple-channel cochlear implant: the interface between sound and the central nervous system for hearing, speech, and language in deaf people-a personal perspective.

Authors:  Graeme M Clark
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2006-05-29       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire into Italian.

Authors:  F Ottaviani; E Iacona; V Sykopetrites; A Schindler; F Mozzanica
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  A comparison of three health status measures in primary care outpatients.

Authors:  D Edelman; G R Williams; M Rothman; G P Samsa
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Vision and quality-of-life.

Authors:  G C Brown
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  1999

Review 6.  Health-related quality of life and hearing aids: a tutorial.

Authors:  Harvey B Abrams; Theresa H Chisolm; Rachel McArdle
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2005

7.  Health state preference scores for children with permanent childhood hearing loss: a comparative analysis of the QWB and HUI3.

Authors:  Laura Smith-Olinde; Scott D Grosse; Frank Olinde; Patti F Martin; John M Tilford
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2008-05-17       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Quality-adjusted life years lost to road crash injury: updating the injury impairment index.

Authors:  Rebecca S Spicer; Ted R Miller; Delia Hendrie; Lawrence J Blincoe
Journal:  Ann Adv Automot Med       Date:  2011

9.  Evidence gaps in economic analyses of hearing healthcare: A systematic review.

Authors:  Ethan D Borre; Mohamed M Diab; Austin Ayer; Gloria Zhang; Susan D Emmett; Debara L Tucci; Blake S Wilson; Kamaria Kaalund; Osondu Ogbuoji; Gillian D Sanders
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2021-05-08

10.  Cochlear implantation in the world's largest medical device market: utilization and awareness of cochlear implants in the United States.

Authors:  Donna L Sorkin
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2013-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.