Literature DB >> 8666645

Function of dislocated hips in children with lower level spina bifida.

B A Alman1, M Bhandari, J G Wright.   

Abstract

We reviewed 52 children, born between 1974 and 1985 with spina bifida affecting L3 and L4, who had dislocated hips. Their motor function was stable and they were able to walk at the time of dislocation. They were interviewed and examined physically and radiologically. Physical function was measured by the Rand Health Insurance Study questionnaire (HIS), the Childhood Health Assessment questionnaire (CHAQ), and by determining the functional level of ambulation according to Hoffer et al (1973). In a subgroup of 12 patients with L4 level of involvement from both treatment groups we measured the metabolic energy consumption while walking. Thirty patient (49 hips) had been treated by operative relocation and 22 conservatively. Ten of the hips treated by operation subluxated or redislocated. The function in the two groups (conservative nu operated) was similar (HIS score 7.8 v 8.0, p = 0.45; CHAQ 14 v 13, p = 0.2; level of mobility 0.61 v 0.63, p = 0.5). Patients in whom operation had failed had worse function than did those with successful surgery (HIS score 8.8 v 6.1, p = 0.025) and those with successful surgery had better function than patients treated conservatively (HIS score 8.8 v 8.0, p = 0.15). Function in patients with failed operations, however, was worse than in those who did not have surgical treatment (HIS score 6.6 v 7.8, p = 0.07). In the 12 so examined the operated group had a 30% more energy-efficient gait (0.271 v 0.361 ml O2 kg/m, p = 0.05). Patients with failed operations had worse function than those who were not operated on. The benefit of surgical relocation of the dislocated hips was marginal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8666645

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  6 in total

Review 1.  Hip and spine surgery is of questionable value in spina bifida: an evidence-based review.

Authors:  James G Wright
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Examining the psychometric characteristics of the Dutch childhood health assessment questionnaire: room for improvement?

Authors:  T Takken; F van den Eijkhof; H Hoijtink; P J M Helders; J van der Net
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2006-02-09       Impact factor: 2.631

Review 3.  Prenatal diagnosis and assessment of congenital spinal anomalies: Review for prenatal counseling.

Authors:  Vidyadhar V Upasani; Pamela Deaver Ketwaroo; Judy A Estroff; Benjamin C Warf; John B Emans; Michael P Glotzbecker
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2016-07-18

4.  Comparing different revisions of the Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire to reduce the ceiling effect and improve score distribution: Data from a multi-center European cohort study of children with JIA.

Authors:  W Groen; E Unal; M Nørgaard; S Maillard; J Scott; K Berggren; E Sandstedt; M Stavrakidou; J van der Net
Journal:  Pediatr Rheumatol Online J       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 3.054

Review 5.  [Orthopedic management of spina bifida].

Authors:  R Biedermann
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  Evaluating score distributions in the revised Dutch version of the Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire.

Authors:  Jessika W Ouwerkerk; Philomine A van Pelt; Tim Takken; Paul Jm Helders; Janjaap van der Net
Journal:  Pediatr Rheumatol Online J       Date:  2008-09-11       Impact factor: 3.054

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.