Literature DB >> 8666445

In vivo measurements of precision of fit involving implant-supported prostheses in the edentulous jaw.

T Jemt1.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to measure and compare the precision of fit of implant-supported prostheses in the edentulous jaw by using both the master cast replicas and the intraoral implants as references. Seven maxillary and 10 mandibular prostheses were randomly selected and measured by means of a three-dimensional (3-D) photogrammetric technique. The results indicated that prostheses routinely connected to osseointegrated implants could demonstrate distortion between the framework and individual implants of up to several hundred microns. When master casts were used as a reference, the mean 3-D distortion of the center point of gold cylinders was 37 microns (SD 18) and 75 microns (SD 40) for mandibular and maxillary prostheses, respectively. The corresponding mean displacement was 90 microns (SD 51) and 111 microns (SD 59), respectively, when the intraoral implants were used as references. The mean 3-D distortion was significantly higher for the intraoral measurements in both arches (P < .001 and P < .05). Furthermore, the overall distortion was significantly higher for the maxillary prostheses when the master casts were used as the reference (P < .05). However, for the intraoral measurements, no statistically significant difference of fit between the arches was possible to observe (P < .05). This could possibly be explained by the finding that intraoral measurements of the mandibular prostheses indicated a deformation and rotation of the mandible that was not observed in the maxillary prostheses. A further factor in the lack of statistical significance could be the relatively small sample size.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8666445

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants        ISSN: 0882-2786            Impact factor:   2.804


  10 in total

1.  Accuracy of five implant impression technique: effect of splinting materials and methods.

Authors:  Sang-Jik Lee; Sung-Bum Cho
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2011-12-28       Impact factor: 1.904

2.  Effect of different impression materials and techniques on the dimensional accuracy of implant definitive casts.

Authors:  Behnaz Ebadian; Mansor Rismanchian; Badrosadat Dastgheib; Farshad Bajoghli
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr

3.  A New Trend in Recording Subgingival Tissue around an Implant While Making a Direct Abutment Impression.

Authors:  Suryakant C Deogade; Sneha S Mantri; Gunjan Dube; Radhika Shrivastava; Syed Noorani
Journal:  Case Rep Dent       Date:  2014-06-01

4.  Accuracy of Implant Casts Generated with Conventional and Digital Impressions-An In Vitro Study.

Authors:  Paulo Ribeiro; Mariano Herrero-Climent; Carmen Díaz-Castro; José Vicente Ríos-Santos; Roberto Padrós; Javier Gil Mur; Carlos Falcão
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  In vitro evaluation of the precision of working casts for implant-supported restoration with multiple abutments.

Authors:  Anderson Almeida Castilho; Alberto Noriyuki Kojima; Sarina Maciel Braga Pereira; Diego Klee de Vasconcellos; Marcos Koiti Itinoche; Renata Faria; Marco Antonio Bottino
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.698

6.  A new portable vibrator for plaster pouring: effect on the marginal fit at cylinder-abutment.

Authors:  Pâmela Cândida Aires Ribas de Andrade; Leonardo Flores Luthi; Kyle Stanley; Antônio Carlos Cardoso
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2012 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.698

7.  Comparison of implant cast accuracy of multiple implant impression technique with different splinting materials: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Sunantha Selvaraj; Jayachandran Dorairaj; Jayashree Mohan; Paul Simon
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun

8.  Three-dimensional accuracy of different impression techniques for dental implants.

Authors:  Mohammadreza Nakhaei; Azam S Madani; Azizollah Moraditalab; Hamidreza Rajati Haghi
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct

9.  Accuracy of fit of implant-supported bars fabricated on definitive casts made by different dental stones.

Authors:  Ioannis Kioleoglou; Argirios Pissiotis; Michalakis Konstantinos
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2018-03-01

10.  The Accuracy of Open-Tray vs. Snap on Impression Techniques in A 6-Implant Model: An In Vitro 3D Study.

Authors:  Adi Arieli; Maram Adawi; Mahmoud Masri; Evgeny Weinberg; Ilan Beitlitum; Raphael Pilo; Shifra Levartovsky
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-12       Impact factor: 3.623

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.