Literature DB >> 8664767

Long-term outcome of patients with neurotic illness in general practice.

K R Lloyd1, R Jenkins, A Mann.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the 11 year outcome of neurotic disorder in general practice.
DESIGN: Cohort study over 11 years.
SETTING: Two general practices in Warwickshire England.
SUBJECTS: 100 patients selected to be representative of those identified nationally by general practitioners as having neurotic disorders. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mortality, morbidity, and use of health services.
RESULTS: At 11 years 87 subjects were traced. The 11 year standardised mortality ratio was 173 (95% confidence interval 164 to 200). 47 were cases on the general health questionnaire, 32 had a relapsing or chronic psychiatric course, and 49 a relapsing or chronic physical course. Treatment for psychiatric illness was mainly drugs. The mean number of consultations per year was 10.8 (median 8.7). A persistent psychiatric diagnosis at one year follow up was associated with high attendance ( > 12 visits a year for 11 years) at follow up after age, sex, and physical illness were adjusted for. Severity of psychiatric illness (general health questionnaire score) at outset predicted general health questionnaire score at 11 year follow up, course of psychiatric illness, and high consultation rate.
CONCLUSION: These data support the view that a neurotic illness can become chronic and is associated with raised mortality from all causes and high use of services. Such patients need effective intervention, particularly those with a more severe illness who do not recover within one year.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8664767      PMCID: PMC2351423          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.313.7048.26

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  12 in total

Review 1.  Recognition and management of depression in general practice: consensus statement.

Authors:  E S Paykel; R G Priest
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-11-14

2.  Treating depression and anxiety in primary care. Closing the gap between knowledge and practice.

Authors:  L Eisenberg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1992-04-16       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Mortality in neurosis.

Authors:  A Sims
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1973-11-10       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  A standardized psychiatric interview for use in community surveys.

Authors:  D P Goldberg; B Cooper; M R Eastwood; H B Kedward; M Shepherd
Journal:  Br J Prev Soc Med       Date:  1970-02

5.  The characteristics of high and low attenders at two general practices.

Authors:  R Corney; J Murray
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 4.328

6.  The pattern of mortality in severe neuroses.

Authors:  A Sims; P Prior
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 9.319

7.  The background, design and use of a short interview to assess social stress and support in research and clinical settings.

Authors:  R Jenkins; A H Mann; E Belsey
Journal:  Soc Sci Med E       Date:  1981-08

8.  The twelve-month outcome of patients with neurotic illness in general practice.

Authors:  A H Mann; R Jenkins; E Belsey
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 7.723

9.  Depression and anxiety among Afro-Caribbean general practice attenders in Britain.

Authors:  K Lloyd
Journal:  Int J Soc Psychiatry       Date:  1993

10.  Twelve month outcome of depression in general practice: does detection or disclosure make a difference?

Authors:  C Dowrick; I Buchan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-11-11
View more
  14 in total

1.  Distinguishing mental illness in primary care. We need to separate proper syndromes from generalised distress.

Authors:  H Middleton; I Shaw
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-05-27

2.  The association between daytime attendance and out-of-hours frequent attendance among adult patients in general practice.

Authors:  P Vedsted; H T Sørensen; J N Nielsen; F Olesen
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 3.  General practitioner psychological management of common emotional problems (I): Definitions and literature review.

Authors:  J Cape; C Barker; M Buszewicz; N Pistrang
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  We need a chronic disease management model for depression in primary care.

Authors:  Andre Tylee; Paul Walters
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  General practitioners' management of mental disorders: a rewarding practice with considerable obstacles.

Authors:  Marie-Josée Fleury; Armelle Imboua; Denise Aubé; Lambert Farand; Yves Lambert
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 2.497

6.  Cross-sectional survey of patients in receipt of long-term repeat prescriptions for antidepressant drugs in primary care.

Authors:  Gillian Cruickshank; Steve Macgillivray; David Bruce; Anne Mather; Keith Matthews; Brian Williams
Journal:  Ment Health Fam Med       Date:  2008-06

7.  Sex and attitude: a randomized vignette study of the management of depression by general practitioners.

Authors:  S Ross; K Moffat; A McConnachie; J Gordon; P Wilson
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 5.386

8.  Material standard of living, social class, and the prevalence of the common mental disorders in Great Britain.

Authors:  S Weich; G Lewis
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 3.710

9.  Men and women have specific needs that facilitate enrollment in HIV-prevention counseling.

Authors:  Marta R Durantini; Dolores Albarracin
Journal:  AIDS Care       Date:  2012-03-05

10.  Evaluation of a system of structured, pro-active care for chronic depression in primary care: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Marta Buszewicz; Mark Griffin; Elaine M McMahon; Jennifer Beecham; Michael King
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 3.630

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.