Literature DB >> 8664135

A randomised trial of two information packages distributed to new cancer patients before their initial appointment at a regional cancer centre.

E A Mohide1, T J Whelan, D Rath, A Gafni, A R Willan, D Czukar, I B Campbell, G S Okawara, M Neimanis, M N Levine.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the extent to which a new patient information package (NPIP) or a mini version of the same package (mini-NPIP) reduces emotional distress and meets the informational needs of patients arriving at a tertiary cancer centre for the first time. A comprehensive package, NPIP, consisting of procedural information regarding cancer centre location, description of the health care team, treatment services, research, educational activities, accommodation and community services provided at the centre; and a condensed version of the same package, mini-NPIP, were developed. Consecutive patients with newly diagnosed breast, gynaecological, lung and prostate cancer, referred to the centre for the first time were prerandomised to receive NPIP, mini-NPIP or no information package. Patients randomised to NPIP or mini-NPIP were mailed the information package at least one week before their first appointment. On arrival at the centre, patients were administered the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI) which measures psychological distress, and interviewed regarding preferences for information and acceptability of the information packages. Of 465 randomised patients, 161 were excluded post-randomisation and 304 completed the entire interview: 100 were randomised to the NPIP, 102 to the mini-NPIP and 102 to the control group. Emotional distress as measured by the BSI was similar for all groups (P = 0.98). Most patients preferred to receive the information (98%), receive it before the first appointment (84%) and by mail (79%). These preferences were more evident for those given the information packages. The majority of patients found the information packages easy to understand (88%) and useful (89%), and no differences were detected between packages. The cost of production and dissemination of NPIP was more than double the cost for mini-NPIP: $ 8.93 vs $ 3.98 (Canadian dollars) per patient. For patients presenting to a cancer centre for the first time, packages of procedural information do not appear to reduce psychological distress, but are preferred by patients. Given the cost of producing NPIP, mini-NPIP is the preferred approach.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8664135      PMCID: PMC2074537          DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1996.299

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  25 in total

1.  Randomised comparison of procedures for obtaining informed consent in clinical trials of treatment for cancer.

Authors:  R J Simes; M H Tattersall; A S Coates; D Raghavan; H J Solomon; H Smartt
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1986-10-25

2.  Reducing the negative impact of radiation therapy on functional status.

Authors:  J E Johnson; L M Nail; D Lauver; K B King; H Keys
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1988-01-01       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  The Brief Symptom Inventory: an introductory report.

Authors:  L R Derogatis; N Melisaratos
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 7.723

4.  Three media presentations for patients receiving radiation therapy.

Authors:  M J Israel; D W Mood
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  1982-02       Impact factor: 2.592

5.  Cancer patients' knowledge of chemotherapy: assessment and informational interventions.

Authors:  M J Dodd
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 2.172

6.  Effects of preparatory patient education for radiation oncology patients.

Authors:  L C Rainey
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1985-09-01       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  The effects of a patient education course on persons with a chronic illness.

Authors:  J Johnson
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 2.592

8.  A simple technique for increasing cancer patients knowledge of informed consent to treatment.

Authors:  G Morrow; J Gootnick; A Schmale
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1978-08       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Survey of the provision of supportive care services at National Cancer Institute-designated cancer centers.

Authors:  P H Coluzzi; M Grant; J H Doroshow; M Rhiner; B Ferrell; L Rivera
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  The sooner the better: a study of psychological factors in women undergoing immediate versus delayed breast reconstruction.

Authors:  W S Schain; D K Wellisch; R O Pasnau; J Landsverk
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 18.112

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Management of gynaecological cancers.

Authors:  A Melville; A Eastwood; J Kleijnen; H Kitchener; P Martin-Hirsch; L Nelson
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1999-12

2.  Informational needs of patients and perceived adequacy of information available before and after treatment of cancer.

Authors:  Nikki A Hawkins; Loria A Pollack; Steven Leadbetter; Whitney Randolph Steele; Jennifer Carroll; James G Dolan; Elizabeth P Ryan; Julie L Ryan; Gary R Morrow
Journal:  J Psychosoc Oncol       Date:  2008

3.  Effects and feasibility of a multi-disciplinary orientation program for newly registered cancer patients: design of a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Raymond Chan; Joan Webster; Linda Bennett
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 2.655

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.