Literature DB >> 8664133

Prospective randomised trial of two dose levels of megestrol acetate in the management of anorexia-cachexia syndrome in patients with metastatic cancer.

V Gebbia1, A Testa, N Gebbia.   

Abstract

Two doses of megestrol acetate (MA) have been prospectively compared in a random fashion as treatment for cancer-related anorexia-cachexia syndrome (ACS) in 122 patients with progressive soft tissue sarcoma, colorectal, lung, head and neck and renal cancer resistant to systemic chemotherapy. After 30 days of MA, 55% of patients receiving MA at 160 mg day-1 reported an increase in appetite, 27% of patients no variation and 18% complained of a decrease in appetite. Patients treated with MA at 320 mg day-1 reported an increase in appetite in 68% of cases, a stabilisation in 20% of cases and a decrease in 12%. Although an increase in appetite was more frequently observed in patients receiving MA at 320 mg day-1, however this difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.305). After 30 days of MA, 31% of patients treated with MA at 160 mg day-1 showed an increase in body weight, 25% a stabilisation and 44% a decrease. In the group of patients treated with MA at 320 mg day-1, 45% reported an increase in body weight, 16% no change and 23% weight loss. Although there was a trend favouring the higher dose of MA, overall analysis however failed to detect any statistically significant difference between the two treatment arms (P = 0.242). Twenty-seven patients pretreated with 160 mg day-1 and 23 patients treated with 320 mg day-1 received further therapy with MA at the dose of 320 and 480 mg day-1 respectively. In the group of 22 patients treated with 320 mg day-1 four (18%) reported an increase in body weight, eight (36%) an improvement in appetite, but none had an increase in performance status. Among the 20 evaluable patients treated with 480 mg day-1, two (10%) had an increase in body weight, four (20%) an improvement in appetite, but none reported an increase in performance status. No difference in median survival was detected between the two arms. Toxicity was mild and predictable. In conclusion, the data achieved in the present study confirm the clinical safety and effectiveness of oral MA in the management of ACS in patients with advanced cancer resistant to systemic chemotherapy. Moreover, data concerning the dose escalation of MA dosage in unresponsive patients suggest that a step by step increase in MA dosage could be the best way of administering MA for the management of ACS and that the increase of MA dosage over 480 mg day-1 will probably be useless in the vast majority of cases. Data on body weight suggest that after 2 weeks' therapy MA could be stopped or its dosage tailored to patients' needs since the majority of patients respond after only 15 days of MA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8664133      PMCID: PMC2074540          DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1996.297

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  24 in total

1.  Plasma concentrations of medroxyprogesterone acetate and megesterol acetate during long-term follow-up in patients treated for metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  A A Miller; R Becher; C G Schmidt
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 2.  Energy metabolism and requirements in the cancer patient.

Authors:  V R Young
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1977-07       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 3.  Total parenteral nutrition in the cancer patient.

Authors:  M F Brennan
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1981-08-13       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Protein-calorie undernutrition in hospitalized cancer patients.

Authors:  D W Nixon; S B Heymsfield; A E Cohen; M H Kutner; J Ansley; D H Lawson; D Rudman
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1980-05       Impact factor: 4.965

5.  Plasma protein synthesis in experimental cancer compared to paraneoplastic conditions, including monokine administration.

Authors:  M Ternell; L L Moldawer; C Lönnroth; J Gelin; K G Lundholm
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1987-11-15       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  Production of lipolytic and proteolytic factors by a murine tumor-producing cachexia in the host.

Authors:  S A Beck; M J Tisdale
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1987-11-15       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  A controlled trial of megestrol acetate on appetite, caloric intake, nutritional status, and other symptoms in patients with advanced cancer.

Authors:  E Bruera; K Macmillan; N Kuehn; J Hanson; R N MacDonald
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1990-09-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  High-dose megestrol acetate in the treatment of postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  N S Tchekmedyian; N Tait; J Aisner
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 4.929

9.  Energy expenditure in malnourished cancer patients.

Authors:  L S Knox; L O Crosby; I D Feurer; G P Buzby; C L Miller; J L Mullen
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 10.  An overview of megestrol acetate for the treatment of advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  S M Sedlacek
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 4.929

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Managing cancer-related anorexia/cachexia.

Authors:  G Mantovani; A Macciò; E Massa; C Madeddu
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 2.  A review of the drug treatment of cachexia associated with cancer.

Authors:  B Gagnon; E Bruera
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Randomized double-blind clinical trial of combined treatment with megestrol acetate plus celecoxib versus megestrol acetate alone in cachexia-anorexia syndrome induced by GI cancers.

Authors:  Bizhan Kouchaki; Ghasem Janbabai; Abbas Alipour; Shahram Ala; Samaneh Borhani; Ebrahim Salehifar
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Megestrol acetate versus metronomic cyclophosphamide in patients having exhausted all effective therapies under standard care.

Authors:  N Penel; S Clisant; E Dansin; C Desauw; M Dégardin; L Mortier; M Vanhuyse; F Bonodeau; C Fournier; J-L Cazin; A Adenis
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 5.  Anorexia: aetiology, epidemiology and management in older people.

Authors:  David R Thomas
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 3.923

6.  Medroxyprogesterone acetate inhibits interleukin 6 secretion from KPL-4 human breast cancer cells both in vitro and in vivo: a possible mechanism of the anticachectic effect.

Authors:  J Kurebayashi; S Yamamoto; T Otsuki; H Sonoo
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  Megestrol acetate for cachexia-anorexia syndrome. A systematic review.

Authors:  Vicente Ruiz-García; Eduardo López-Briz; Rafael Carbonell-Sanchis; Sylvia Bort-Martí; José Luis Gonzálvez-Perales
Journal:  J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 12.910

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.