Literature DB >> 8662107

Nuclear medicine and mathematics.

J J Pedroso de Lima1.   

Abstract

The purpose of this review is not to present a comprehensive description of all the mathematical tools used in nuclear medicine, but to emphasize the importance of the mathematical method in nuclear medicine and to elucidate some of the mathematical concepts currently used. We can distinguish three different areas in which mathematical support has been offered to nuclear medicine: physiology, methodology and data processing. Nevertheless, the boundaries between these areas can be indistinct. It is impossible in a single article to give even an idea of the extent and complexity of the procedures currently used in nuclear medicine, such as image processing, reconstruction from projections and artificial intelligence. These disciplines do not belong to nuclear medicine: they are already branches of engineering, and my interest will reside simply in revealing a little of the elegance and the fantastic potential of these new "allies" of nuclear medicine. In this review the mathematics of physiological interpretation and methodology are considered together in the same section. General aspects of data-processing methods, including image processing and artificial intelligence, are briefly analysed. The mathematical tools that are most often used to assist the interpretation of biological phenomena in nuclear medicine are considered; these include convolution and deconvolution methods, Fourier analysis, factorial analysis and neural networking.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8662107     DOI: 10.1007/bf00834535

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0340-6997


  13 in total

1.  Perceptual and statistical analysis of cardiac phase and amplitude images.

Authors:  A Houston; A Craig
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1991

Review 2.  Mathematical modelling in nuclear medicine.

Authors:  J T Kuikka; J B Bassingthwaighte; M M Henrich; L E Feinendegen
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1991

3.  Image processing in nuclear pneumology.

Authors:  J J de Lima
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  1995 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.428

4.  On the existence of an unambiguous solution in factor analysis of dynamic studies.

Authors:  M Sámal; M Kárný; H Sůrová; P Pĕnicka; E Maríková; Z Dienstbier
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Deconvolution of Compton scatter in SPECT.

Authors:  C E Floyd; R J Jaszczak; K L Greer; R E Coleman
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  Deconvolution analysis in radionuclide quantitation of left-to-right cardiac shunts.

Authors:  P O Alderson; K H Douglass; K G Mendenhall; V A Guadiani; D C Watson; J M Links; H N Wagner
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1979-06       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  Understanding and using statistics in nuclear medicine.

Authors:  S G Levin
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1979-06       Impact factor: 10.057

8.  Subtraction of Compton-scattered photons in single-photon emission computerized tomography.

Authors:  B Axelsson; P Msaki; A Israelsson
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  Deconvolution analysis of radionuclide angiocardiography curves: problems arising from fragmented bolus injections.

Authors:  A J Brendel; D Commenges; R Salamon; D Ducassou; P Blanquet
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1983

10.  Hepatocyte versus biliary disease: a distinction by deconvolutional analysis of technetium-99m IDA time-activity curves.

Authors:  P H Brown; J E Juni; D A Lieberman; G T Krishnamurthy
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 10.057

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.