Literature DB >> 8662060

Latex allergy in patients with myelomeningocele presenting for imaging studies of the urinary tract.

J M Zerin1, K McLaughlin, S Kerchner.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We prospectively surveyed patients with myelomeningocele who presented in our department over a 3-month period to determine the frequency of latex allergy in this population.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A questionnaire assessed history of allergy to latex and attitudes toward and use or avoidance of latex-containing products in both medical and nonmedical environments.
RESULTS: Surveys were completed by 118 patients (56 boys, 62 girls; mean age 10.4 years, range 0.6-30.9 years). Seventy-two (61%) had heard of latex allergy and 25 (21%) reported being allergic to latex. Most allergic patients were performing intermittent self-catheterization (92%) and tended to be slightly older (mean age 12.7 years) than those not reporting allergy (mean age 9.8 years). Although most reactions were limited to rashes and mucosal irritation, two patients experienced anaphylaxis with severe respiratory symptoms or hypotension or both. No reactions had occurred in the Department of Radiology. While 84% of patients with previous allergic reactions reported trying to avoid further exposure to latex in the hospital, at home, or in school, only 14% of non-allergic patients took any special precautions.
CONCLUSION: Allergy to latex is common in patients with myelomeningocele who are examined in our department. We have developed a policy designed to prevent exposure of such patients to latex during imaging studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8662060     DOI: 10.1007/bf01377199

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Radiol        ISSN: 0301-0449


  12 in total

Review 1.  Latex allergy. A guideline for perioperative nurses.

Authors:  M A Young; M Meyers; L D McCulloch; L J Brown
Journal:  AORN J       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 0.676

2.  Allergic reactions to latex among health-care workers.

Authors:  M E Bubak; C E Reed; A F Fransway; J W Yunginger; R T Jones; C A Carlson; L W Hunt
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 7.616

3.  Latex precautions should be used in all spina bifida patients.

Authors:  P K Birmingham; R M Dsida
Journal:  Pediatr Neurosurg       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.162

4.  Rubber anaphylaxis.

Authors:  J E Slater
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1989-04-27       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Contact urticaria to rubber.

Authors:  A F Nutter
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 9.302

6.  Type I hypersensitivity to rubber.

Authors:  J E Slater; L A Mostello; C Shaer; R W Honsinger
Journal:  Ann Allergy       Date:  1990-11

7.  Anaphylaxis associated with latex allergy during barium enema examinations.

Authors:  D R Ownby; M Tomlanovich; N Sammons; J McCullough
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Evaluation and risk factors of latex allergy in spina bifida patients: is it preventable?

Authors:  P I Ellsworth; P A Merguerian; R B Klein; A A Rozycki
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Latex allergy in spina bifida patients: prevalence and surgical implications.

Authors:  L L Tosi; J E Slater; C Shaer; L A Mostello
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  1993 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.324

10.  Latex anaphylaxis during spinal surgery in children with myelomeningocele.

Authors:  J V Banta; C Bonanni; J Prebluda
Journal:  Dev Med Child Neurol       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 5.449

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Follow-up urodynamics in patients with neurogenic bladder.

Authors:  Sanjay Sinha
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2017 Oct-Dec
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.