Literature DB >> 86597

Reflection coefficients of homopore membranes: effect of molecular size and configuration.

J S Schultz, R Valentine, C Y Choi.   

Abstract

Osmotic water flow through membranes with uniform defined pores was measured for a variety of macromolecular solutes. Water flow increased linearly with applied hydrostatic pressure, allowing the effective osmotic pressure of the solutes to be estimated by extrapolation. Reflection coefficients for each solute-membrane combination were calculated and correlated with the ratio of solute size to pore size. For the same mean molecular size, proteins were found to have larger reflection coefficients than dextrans. Molecular rigidity may play a role in this difference in behavior.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1979        PMID: 86597      PMCID: PMC2215232          DOI: 10.1085/jgp.73.1.49

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Physiol        ISSN: 0022-1295            Impact factor:   4.086


  7 in total

1.  A physical interpretation of the phenomenological coefficients of membrane permeability.

Authors:  O KEDEM; A KATCHALSKY
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1961-09       Impact factor: 4.086

2.  Hindrance of solute diffusion within membranes as measured with microporous membranes of known pore geometry.

Authors:  R E Beck; J S Schultz
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1972-01-17

3.  Mechanism of osmotic flow in porous membranes.

Authors:  J L Anderson; D M Malone
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1974-12       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  A hydrodynamic description of the osmotic reflection coefficient with application to the pore theory of transcapillary exchange.

Authors:  F E Curry
Journal:  Microvasc Res       Date:  1974-09       Impact factor: 3.514

5.  Solute flux coupling in a homopore membrane.

Authors:  J T Van Bruggen; J D Boyett; A L van Bueren; W R Galey
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1974-06       Impact factor: 4.086

6.  Gel chromatography of proteins in denaturing solvents. Comparison between sodium dodecyl sulfate and guanidine hydrochloride as denaturants.

Authors:  W W Fish; J A Reynolds; C Tanford
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1970-10-10       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Water flow through frog gastric mucosa.

Authors:  R P DURBIN; H FRANK; A K SOLOMON
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1956-03-20       Impact factor: 4.086

  7 in total
  5 in total

1.  Solute concentration effect on osmotic reflection coefficient.

Authors:  R P Adamski; J L Anderson
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Action of polysaccharides of similar average mass but differing molecular volume and charge on fluid drainage through synovial interstitium in rabbit knees.

Authors:  D Scott; P J Coleman; R M Mason; J R Levick
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2000-11-01       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Ultrastructure of the glomerular basement membrane of rats with proteinuria due to subtotal nephrectomy.

Authors:  S M Shea; J Raskova; A B Morrison
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 4.307

4.  Dead-space microdomains hinder extracellular diffusion in rat neocortex during ischemia.

Authors:  Sabina Hrabetová; Jan Hrabe; Charles Nicholson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-09-10       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Osmotic Effects Induced by Pore-Forming Agent Nystatin: From Lipid Vesicles to the Cell.

Authors:  Špela Zemljič Jokhadar; Bojan Božič; Luka Kristanc; Gregor Gomišček
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.