Literature DB >> 8659374

Arterial-phase three-dimensional contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the carotid arteries.

R A Levy1, M R Prince.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate IV injection of a single dose of gadopentetate dimeglumine for three-dimensional (3D) arterial phase MR angiography of the carotid arteries. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Nine adult patients were serially imaged after IV injection of a single-dose bolus of gadopentetate dimeglumine at 1.5 T with a coronal single-slice spoiled two-dimensional (2D) gradient-echo acquisition encompassing the common carotid arteries and internal jugular veins. Region-of-interest measurements for the nine patients generated a composite arteriovenous signal versus time profile. The time interval of maximum arteriovenous signal difference was subsequently matched to the center of K-space in a 3D spoiled gradient-echo coronal MR angiography sequence (field of view, 24 or 26 cm; matrix size, 256 x 128; slice thickness, 3 mm; number of slices, 12; one excitation; bandwidth, 16 kHz; and scan time, 29 sec). This protocol allowed us to selectively enhance the arterial phase for carotid angiography. The protocol was then tested in 20 adult patients, after which we graded the degree of coincidental venous enhancement and the presence of artifacts.
RESULTS: On the 2D dynamic images, we identified a 10-sec window of selective arterial enhancement that began 20 sec after the start of the injection of the bolus of gadopentetate dimeglumine. With 3D MR angiography, we saw selective enhancement during the arterial phase of carotid MR angiography in nine of 20 patients. In seven of the remaining 11 patients, we saw the signal intensity of the arterial phase exceed a threshold greater than two standard deviations from venous signal. In the final four patients, we saw arterial signal equal to venous signal. We saw no ghosting artifact (from intravascular signal changing too rapidly during phase encoding) in any patient.
CONCLUSION: By precisely timing the infusion of a single dose of gadopentetate dimeglumine, we were able to selectively enhance the arterial phase on 3D MR angiograms of the carotid arteries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8659374     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.167.1.8659374

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  9 in total

1.  MR digital subtraction angiography of cerebral arteriovenous malformations.

Authors:  K Tsuchiya; S Katase; A Yoshino; J Hachiya
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 2.  Current concepts in the evaluation of vascular disease: magnetic resonance and computed tomographic angiography.

Authors:  B D Toombs; J M Jing
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2000

3.  Contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography of the carotid artery: comparison with conventional digital subtraction angiography.

Authors:  Luca Remonda; Pascal Senn; Alain Barth; Marcel Arnold; Karl-Olof Lövblad; Gerhard Schroth
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Prospective evaluation of carotid artery stenosis: elliptic centric contrast-enhanced MR angiography and spiral CT angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography.

Authors:  Juan Alvarez-Linera; Julián Benito-León; José Escribano; Jorge Campollo; Ricardo Gesto
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 5.  Pulmonary arterial hypertension: an imaging review comparing MR pulmonary angiography and perfusion with multidetector CT angiography.

Authors:  F P Junqueira; C M A O Lima; A C Coutinho; D B Parente; L K Bittencourt; L G P Bessa; R C Domingues; E Marchiori
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  High spatial resolution whole-neck MR angiography using thin-slab stack-of-stars quiescent interval slice-selective acquisition.

Authors:  Ioannis Koktzoglou; Rong Huang; Archie L Ong; Pascale J Aouad; Matthew T Walker; Robert R Edelman
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Utility of CT angiography and MR angiography for the follow-up of experimental aneurysms treated with stents or Guglielmi detachable coils.

Authors:  A M Masaryk; R Frayne; O Unal; A H Rappe; C M Strother
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  Preliminary experience using contrast-enhanced MR angiography to assess vertebral artery structure for the follow-up of suspected dissection.

Authors:  X Leclerc; C Lucas; O Godefroy; L Nicol; A Moretti; D Leys; J P Pruvo
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.825

9.  Intra-arterial versus intra venous contrast-enhanced computed tomography of the equine head.

Authors:  Casper P Crijns; Yseult Baeumlin; Lieve De Rycke; Bart J G Broeckx; Lieven Vlaminck; Erik H J Bergman; Henri van Bree; Ingrid Gielen
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 2.741

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.