Literature DB >> 8657942

Radiation-attenuating surgical gloves: effects of scatter and secondary electron production.

L K Wagner1, O R Mulhern.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of scatter and secondary electron production on the protection provided by flexible radiation-attenuating gloves.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four sets of radiation-attenuating flexible gloves and one set of standard surgical gloves were tested for scattering characteristics and secondary electron production caused by the interactions of x rays inside the gloves. A thin-window ion chamber was used to measure the penetration of secondary electrons in polyethylene. A diagnostic-type chamber was used to measure forward-scattered and backscattered x rays produced by the gloves.
RESULTS: Forward-scattered and backscattered x rays added an average of about 13% to the exposure of the hands. Secondary electrons increased the signal in the thin-window chamber by large factors but were weakly penetrating, and only a small fraction produced by x rays of 90 kVp and higher energies contributed to dose to basal cells.
CONCLUSION: Forward-scattered and backscattered x rays reduce the effectiveness of radiation-attenuating gloves, and secondary electron dose to basal cells in the back of the hand can further reduce effectiveness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8657942     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.200.1.8657942

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  13 in total

Review 1.  Personal dosimetry for interventional operators: when and how should monitoring be done?

Authors:  C J Martin
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Occupational radiation protection in interventional radiology: a joint guideline of the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology Society of Europe and the Society of Interventional Radiology.

Authors:  Donald L Miller; Eliseo Vañó; Gabriel Bartal; Stephen Balter; Robert Dixon; Renato Padovani; Beth Schueler; John F Cardella; Thierry de Baère
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2009-12-18       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 3.  What are useful methods to reduce occupational radiation exposure among radiological medical workers, especially for interventional radiology personnel?

Authors:  Koichi Chida
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2022-05-24

Review 4.  Minimizing radiation injury and neoplastic effects during pediatric fluoroscopy: what should we know?

Authors:  Louis Kenneth Wagner
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2006-09

Review 5.  Are we putting ourselves in danger? Occupational hazards and job safety for orthopaedic surgeons.

Authors:  Robert C Ryu; Phillip H Behrens; Azeem T Malik; Jonathan D Lester; Christopher S Ahmad
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2021-02-20

6.  Assessment of Radiation Protection in Hand-Shielding Products With Mini C-Arm Fluoroscopy.

Authors:  Matthew B Cantlon; Asif M Ilyas
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2019-08-12

Review 7.  Intraoperative radiation safety in orthopaedics: a review of the ALARA (As low as reasonably achievable) principle.

Authors:  Daniel J Kaplan; Jay N Patel; Frank A Liporace; Richard S Yoon
Journal:  Patient Saf Surg       Date:  2016-12-12

8.  Comparing radiation exposure during percutaneous vertebroplasty using one- vs. two-fluoroscopic technique.

Authors:  Yen-Yao Li; Tsung-Jen Huang; Chin-Chang Cheng; Meng-Huang Wu; Ching-Yu Lee
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  Surgeons' exposure to radiation in single- and multi-level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion; a prospective study.

Authors:  Haruki Funao; Ken Ishii; Suketaka Momoshima; Akio Iwanami; Naobumi Hosogane; Kota Watanabe; Masaya Nakamura; Yoshiaki Toyama; Morio Matsumoto
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Time to take the gloves off: the use of radiation reduction gloves can greatly increase patient dose.

Authors:  Alexander S Pasciak; A Kyle Jones
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2014-11-08       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.