Literature DB >> 8657237

Comparison of coronary bypass surgery with angioplasty in patients with multivessel disease.

.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG) and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) are alternative methods of revascularization in patients with coronary artery disease. We tested the hypothesis that in selected patients with multivessel disease suitable for treatment with either procedure, an initial strategy of PTCA does not result in a poorer five-year clinical outcome than CABG.
METHODS: Patients with multivessel disease were randomly assigned to an initial treatment strategy of CABG (n = 914) or PTCA (n = 915) and were followed for an average of 5.4 years. Analysis of outcome events was performed according to the intention to treat.
RESULTS: The respective in-hospital event rates for CABG and PTCA were 1.3 percent and 1.1 percent for mortality, 4.6 percent and 2.1 percent for Q-wave myocardial infarction (P < 0.01), and 0.8 percent and 0.2 percent for stroke. The five-year survival rate was 89.3 percent for those assigned to CABG and 86.3 percent for those assigned to PTCA (P = 0.19; 95 percent confidence interval of the difference in survival, -0.2 percent to 6.0 percent). The respective five-year survival rates free from Q-wave myocardial infarction were 80.4 percent and 78.7 percent. By five years after study entry, 8 percent of the patients assigned to CABG had undergone additional revascularization procedures, as compared with 54 percent of those assigned to PTCA; 69 percent of those assigned to PTCA did not subsequently undergo CABG. Among diabetic patients who were being treated with insulin or oral hypoglycemic agents at base line, a subgroup not specified by the protocol, five-year survival was 80.6 percent for the CABG group as compared with 65.5 percent for the PTCA group (P = 0.003).
CONCLUSIONS: As compared with CABG, an initial strategy of PTCA did not significantly compromise five-year survival in patients with multivessel disease, although subsequent revascularization was required more often with this strategy. For treated diabetics, five-year survival was significantly better after CABG than after PTCA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8657237     DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199607253350401

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  182 in total

Review 1.  Differences in outcome between percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary bypass grafting.

Authors:  J S Alpert
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 2.  Revascularization strategies in patients with diabetes: evolving concepts.

Authors:  J J Brennan; H S Cabin
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2000 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Proceedings of the 4th Invitational Wintergreen Conference. Wintergreen, Virginia, USA. July 12-14, 1998. Abstracts.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  1999 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Is surgery still the preferred option for coronary revascularisation in diabetics with multivessel coronary disease?

Authors:  A Kapur; I S Malik
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 5.994

5.  Surgical ineligibility and mortality among patients with unprotected left main or multivessel coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Stephen W Waldo; Eric A Secemsky; Cashel O'Brien; Kevin F Kennedy; Eugene Pomerantsev; Thoralf M Sundt; Edward J McNulty; Benjamin M Scirica; Robert W Yeh
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Percutaneous coronary intervention in diabetics: time to consider "intimal remodelling therapy"?

Authors:  P F Ludman
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 7.  Indications for percutaneous and surgical revascularisation: how far does the evidence base guide us?

Authors:  P M Schofield
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 8.  Percutaneous coronary intervention in diabetics.

Authors:  Juhana Karha; Deepak L Bhatt
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 6.514

Review 9.  Revascularisation in diabetics with multivessel coronary artery disease.

Authors:  K J Beatt; K P Morgan; A Kapur
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 10.  The role of PCI and CABG in the management of coronary artery disease in patients with diabetes.

Authors:  Robert L Frye; Malcolm R Bell; Hartzell V Schaff; Richard Holubkov; Katherine M Detre
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.810

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.