Literature DB >> 8656904

Breast cancer and hormonal contraceptives: collaborative reanalysis of individual data on 53 297 women with breast cancer and 100 239 women without breast cancer from 54 epidemiological studies.

.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND The Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer has brought together and reanalysed the worldwide epidemiological evidence on the relation between breast cancer risk and use of hormonal contraceptives. METHODS Individual data on 53 297 women with breast cancer and 100 239 women without breast cancer from 54 studies conducted in 25 countries were collected, checked, and analysed centrally. Estimates of the relative risk for breast cancer were obtained by a modification of the Mantel-Haenszel method. All analyses were stratified by study, age at diagnosis, parity, and, where appropriate, the age a woman was when her first child was born, and the age she was when her risk of conception ceased. FINDINGS The results provide strong evidence for two main conclusions. First, while women are taking combined oral contraceptives and in the 10 years after stopping there is a small increase in the relative risk of having breast cancer diagnosed (relative risk [95 percent CI] in current users 1.24 [1.15-1.33], 2p<0.00001; 1-4 years after stopping 1.16 [1.08-1.23], 2p=0.00001; 5-9 years after stopping 1.07 [1.02-1.13], 2p=0.009). Second, there is no significant excess risk of having breast cancer diagnosed 10 or more years after stopping use (relative risk 1.01 [0.96-1.05], NS). The cancers diagnosed in women who had used combined oral contraceptives were less advanced clinically than those diagnosed in women who had never used these contraceptives for ever-users compared with never-users, the relative risk for tumours that had spread beyond the breast compared with localised tumours was 0.88 (0.81-0.95; 2p=0.002). There was no pronounced variation in the results for recency of use between women with different background risks of breast cancer, including women from different countries and ethnic groups, women with different reproductive histories, and those with or without a family history of breast cancer. The studies included in this collaboration represent about 90 percent of the epidemiological information on the topic, and what is known about the other studies suggests that their omission has not materially affected the main conclusions. Other features of hormonal contraceptive use such as duration of use, age at first use, and the dose and type of hormone within the contraceptives had little additional effect on breast cancer risk, once recency of use had been taken into account. Women who began use before age 20 had higher relative risks of having breast cancer diagnosed while they were using combined oral contraceptives and in the 5 years after stopping than women who began use at older ages, but the higher relative risks apply at ages when breast cancer is rare and, for a given duration of use, earlier use does not result in more cancers being diagnosed than use beginning at older ages. Because breast cancer incidence rises steeply with age, the estimated excess number of cancers diagnosed in the period between starting use and 10 years after stopping increases with age at last use: for example, among 10 000 women from Europe or North America who used oral contraceptives from age 16 to 19, from age 20 to 24, and from age 25 to 29, respectively, the estimated excess number of cancers diagnosed up to 10 years after stopping use is 0.5 (95 percent CI 0.3-0.7), 1.5 (0.7-2.3), and 4.7 (2.7-6.7). Up to 20 years after cessation of use the difference between ever-users and never-users is not so much in the total number of cancers diagnosed, but in their clinical presentation, with the breast cancers diagnosed in ever-users being less advanced clinically than those diagnosed in never-users. The relation observed between breast cancer risk and hormone exposure is unusual, and it is not possible to infer from these data whether it is due to an earlier diagnosis of breast cancer in ever-users, the biological effects of hormonal contraceptives, or a combination of reasons...

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8656904     DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)90806-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  216 in total

1.  Mortality associated with oral contraceptive use. Confounding might have accounted for results.

Authors:  A Szarewski; H C Kitchener
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-08-07

2.  "On a supposed right to lie [to the public] from benevolent motives": communicating health risks to the public.

Authors:  D Shickle
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2000

3.  Systematic reviews of evaluations of prognostic variables.

Authors:  D G Altman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-07-28

4.  Oral contraceptives and the risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  Donald Farquhar
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-10-01       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 5.  Combined hormonal contraceptives: prescribing patterns, compliance, and benefits versus risks.

Authors:  Jan Brynhildsen
Journal:  Ther Adv Drug Saf       Date:  2014-10

Review 6.  Long-cycle treatment with oral contraceptives.

Authors:  Inka Wiegratz; Herbert Kuhl
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 9.546

7.  Use of oral contraceptives, intrauterine devices and tubal sterilization and cancer risk in a large prospective study, from 1996 to 2006.

Authors:  Tsogzolmaa Dorjgochoo; Xiao-Ou Shu; Hong-Lan Li; Han-Zhu Qian; Gong Yang; Hui Cai; Yu-Tang Gao; Wei Zheng
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 7.396

8.  A case-control study of oral contraceptive use and incident breast cancer.

Authors:  Lynn Rosenberg; Yuqing Zhang; Patricia F Coogan; Brian L Strom; Julie R Palmer
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-12-13       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 9.  Epidemiology of endocrine-related risk factors for breast cancer.

Authors:  Leslie Bernstein
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.673

10.  Oral Contraceptive Use and Risks of Cancer in the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study.

Authors:  Kara A Michels; Louise A Brinton; Ruth M Pfeiffer; Britton Trabert
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 4.897

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.