Literature DB >> 8656483

Improved accuracy of burn wound assessment using laser Doppler.

E K Yeong1, R Mann, M Goldberg, L Engrav, D Heimbach.   

Abstract

The utility of the laser Doppler for determining burn depth has been questioned because of problems with technology and methodology. This study prospectively evaluates the ability of a new laser Doppler technique to predict burn healing time. Using the Periflux System 4000 laser Doppler, readings were taken on 305 burns (147 patients) on postburn day 3 or 4. Sixty-six wounds were used to derive a predictive function (phase I) and 152 wounds were used to test the function (phase II). Blood flow dynamics (flux), microvascular dilation capacity of the wounds to beat stress, and flow motion wave pattern (vasomotion) were studied using the laser Doppler, and seven parameters were evaluated to determine their relative contribution to the prediction of healing time. These parameters are hyperemic flux (flux value after heating to 42 degrees C), average hyperemic wave amplitude (AHWA), number of average flux units >100(F100), number readings with wave amplitude 75 (A5), average flux change (AFC), percentage of average flux increase, and relative flow capacity (RFC = AFC/average hyperemic flux). After readings were made, the wounds were observed and divided into two groups: those that healed in less than 14 days and those that healed or were grafted after 14 days. A step-wise discriminant analysis was used to assess the relative contribution of the Doppler-derived measures to healing time prediction. AHWA, F100, and RFC were included in the final discriminant function explaining 72% of the healing time variance (Wilks' lambda value 0.28; p value <0.0001). Predicted outcome = 0.05(AHWA) + 0.31(F100) + 5.0(RFC) - 2.3. With this derived function, there is 94% accuracy in the prediction of burn wound healing time compared with a physician predictive accuracy of 70%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8656483     DOI: 10.1097/00005373-199606000-00015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma        ISSN: 0022-5282


  5 in total

Review 1.  State of the art in burn treatment.

Authors:  Bishara S Atiyeh; S William Gunn; Shady N Hayek
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Burn wound depth assessment--is laser Doppler imaging the best measurement tool available?

Authors:  Anirban Mandal
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.315

3.  Topical radiant heating in wound healing: an experimental study in a donor site wound model*.

Authors:  Aadil A Khan; Paul E Banwell; Martijn C Bakker; Patrick G Gillespie; Douglas A McGrouther; Anthony H N Roberts
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.315

4.  Measuring niacin-associated skin toxicity (NASTy) stigmata along with symptoms to aid development of niacin mimetics.

Authors:  Richard L Dunbar; Harsh Goel; Sony Tuteja; Wen-Liang Song; Grace Nathanson; Zeeshan Babar; Dusanka Lalic; Joel M Gelfand; Daniel J Rader; Gary L Grove
Journal:  J Lipid Res       Date:  2017-01-23       Impact factor: 5.922

5.  Using ordinal logistic regression to evaluate the performance of laser-Doppler predictions of burn-healing time.

Authors:  Rose D Baker; Christian Weinand; James C Jeng; Henk Hoeksema; Stan Monstrey; Sarah A Pape; Robert Spence; David Wilson
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2009-02-16       Impact factor: 4.615

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.