Literature DB >> 8655783

Developing ethical standards for responsible research: Why? Form? Functions? Process? Outcomes?

M S Frankel1.   

Abstract

Any profession that is considering the development of ethical standards should give serious attention to the intended purposes of such standards, what form they should take, what functions they will serve, how the process for developing them should be organized, what outcomes are sought, and what values are central to the mission and performance of the profession. The profession serves as a normative reference group for individual practitioners and through ethical standards clarifies, for both its members and outsiders, the norms that ought to govern professional behavior. Such standards may be aspirational, educational, or regulatory, and may perform many functions, nine of which are discussed. The process of developing standards is assessed because of the role it plays in gaining consensus on professional values and ethical norms. Finally, several outcomes likely to increase the value and utility of ethical standards are identified.

Keywords:  American Association for Dental Research; Bioethics and Professional Ethics; Biomedical and Behavioral Research

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8655783     DOI: 10.1177/00220345960750021601

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dent Res        ISSN: 0022-0345            Impact factor:   6.116


  4 in total

1.  Ambiguity, trust, and the responsible conduct of research.

Authors:  Frederick Grinnell
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Developing a code of ethics for academics. Commentary on 'Ethics for all: differences across scientific society codes' (Bullock and Panicker).

Authors:  Celia B Fisher
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.525

Review 3.  Authorship and publication practices in the social sciences: historical reflections on current practices.

Authors:  Muriel J Bebeau; Verna Monson
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2011-06-07       Impact factor: 3.525

4.  Stakeholder views of ethical guidance regarding prevention and care in HIV vaccine trials.

Authors:  Rika Moorhouse; Catherine Slack; Michael Quayle; Zaynab Essack; Graham Lindegger
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 2.652

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.