Literature DB >> 8654141

Ambulatory esophageal pH testing. Referral patterns, indication, and treatment in a Canadian teaching hospital.

J P Shoenut1, C S Yaffe.   

Abstract

Over a 30-month period, 867 esophageal pH studies were conducted in a Canadian teaching hospital; of these, 315 tests were recorded in patients who were first-time referrals having no chest or upper gastrointestinal surgery and taking no medication that would affect the results. Patients were referred by gastroenterologists, general surgeons, ENT surgeons, thoracic surgeons, and a miscellaneous group. Patients were classified based on: pH results [abnormal = % total time pH < 4.0 (ie, > 6.0%)], manometry (abnormal = LES resting pressure < 5 mm Hg and/or abnormal peristalsis), and gender. Fifty-one percent (162/315) of the patient records demonstrated abnormal reflux. Intergroup comparisons of severity of reflux using two-way analysis of variance demonstrated no significant differences (P = 0.13). In the 162 patients who refluxed, 70% (N = 108) had normal motility studies; however, when the severity of reflux was compared, patients with abnormal motility (N = 54) demonstrated significantly more severe reflux (19.8 +/- 12.8 vs 16.2 +/- 11.3) P = 0.02. In those patients with abnormal manometry, no significant differences (P = 0.44) in the severity of reflux were found among those with abnormal peristalsis (N = 27), low resting pressure (N = 17), or a combination of aperistalsis and low LES pressure (N = 10). Symptomatic patients with reflux (N = 107) demonstrated a significantly greater percent time pH < 4.0 than those with asymptomatic reflux (N = 55); 18.1 +/- 11.5% vs 16.2 +/- 12.7%, P = 0.04. When the severity of reflux by gender was compared, no significant differences were found [18.3 +/- 11.9 (male) N = 91 vs 16.2 +/- 11.9 (female) N = 71, P = 0.11]. The results from this study show that: (1) esophageal pH testing is important in subspecialties other than gastroenterology and that the clinical yield is high in all referring groups, (2) esophageal pH testing and manometry are complimentary tests, but that reflux occurs commonly in association with normal manometry, (3) asymptomatic reflux was found in 34% of the patients with abnormal reflux scores, and (4) the severity of reflux in male and female patients is similar.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8654141     DOI: 10.1007/bf02088226

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  18 in total

1.  Scintigraphy in gastroesophageal reflux disease: a comparison to endoscopy, LESp, and 24-h pH score, as well as to simultaneous pH monitoring.

Authors:  S S Shay; S H Abreu; A Tsuchida
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 10.864

2.  Controversies, dilemmas, and dialogues. In the community hospital setting, what is the role of esophageal manometry?

Authors:  M Robinson; M L Allen; W C Wu
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 3.  Transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation.

Authors:  R K Mittal; R H Holloway; R Penagini; L A Blackshaw; J Dent
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 22.682

4.  Reflux in untreated achalasia patients.

Authors:  J P Shoenut; A B Micflikier; C S Yaffe; B Den Boer; J M Teskey
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 3.062

5.  Ambulatory 24 hour intraesophageal pH-monitoring in the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  F Johnsson; B Joelsson; P E Isberg
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  Audit of the role of oesophageal manometry in clinical practice.

Authors:  P W Johnston; B T Johnston; B J Collins; J S Collins; A H Love
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  Technique, indications, and clinical use of 24 hour esophageal pH monitoring.

Authors:  T R DeMeester; C I Wang; J A Wernly; C A Pellegrini; A G Little; P Klementschitsch; G Bermudez; L F Johnson; D B Skinner
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1980-05       Impact factor: 5.209

8.  The extent and pattern of gastro-oesophageal reflux in patients with scleroderma oesophagus: the effect of low-dose omeprazole.

Authors:  J P Shoenut; J A Wieler; A B Micflikier
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 8.171

9.  Utility of inpatient 24-hour intraesophageal pH monitoring in diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux.

Authors:  A Pujol; L Grande; E Ros; C Pera
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 3.199

10.  Retrosternal pain subsequent to sclerotherapy.

Authors:  J P Shoenut; A B Micflikier
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 9.427

View more
  3 in total

1.  Impact of ingested liquids on 24-hour ambulatory pH tests.

Authors:  J P Shoenut; D Duerksen; C S Yaffe
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Streamlining 24-hour pH study for GERD: Use of a 3-hour postprandial test.

Authors:  Amindra S Arora; Joseph A Murray
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Ethnicity and gender related differences in extended intraesophageal pH monitoring parameters in infants: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Dena Nazer; Ronald Thomas; Vasundhara Tolia
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2005-07-18       Impact factor: 2.125

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.