Literature DB >> 8653966

Evaluation of collagen ceramic composite graft materials in a spinal fusion model.

G F Muschler1, S Negami, A Hyodo, D Gaisser, K Easley, H Kambic.   

Abstract

Autogenous bone graft is highly effective in inducing a bone healing response in most clinical settings. However, significant morbidity can occur related to the harvest of an autograft. This makes the development of synthetic or purified nontissue bone grafting materials highly desirable. Both purified bovine Type I collagen and calcium phosphate ceramics have been proposed as promising osteoconductive bone graft substitute materials. One collagen ceramic composite, Collagraft, is approved for use in acute long bone fractures. This study evaluated composites of purified bovine Type I fibrillar collagen and a granular biphasic hydroxyapatite/tricalcium phosphate ceramic in the posterior segmental canine spinal fusion model. Materials were compared based on union score and mechanical testing in 3 separate fusion sites (L1-2, L3-4, L5-6). All composites were found to be inferior in union score to an equal volume of autogenous cancellous bone. In addition, the combination of the collagen ceramic composite with autogenous cancellous bone graft reduced the effectiveness of the autogenous bone graft significantly. These data should be a caution to the clinician who may consider use of collagen ceramic composites similar to Collagraft for spinal fusion applications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8653966     DOI: 10.1097/00003086-199607000-00039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  14 in total

1.  Spine fusion using cell matrix composites enriched in bone marrow-derived cells.

Authors:  George F Muschler; Hironori Nitto; Yoichi Matsukura; Cynthia Boehm; Antonio Valdevit; Helen Kambic; William Davros; Kimerly Powell; Kirk Easley
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Spinal fusion using an autologous growth factor gel and a porous resorbable ceramic.

Authors:  William R Walsh; Andreas Loefler; Sean Nicklin; Doug Arm; Ralph E Stanford; Yan Yu; Richard Harris; R M Gillies
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-03-18       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Selective retention of bone marrow-derived cells to enhance spinal fusion.

Authors:  George F Muschler; Yoichi Matsukura; Hironori Nitto; Cynthia A Boehm; Antonio D Valdevit; Helen E Kambic; William J Davros; Kirk A Easley; Kimerly A Powell
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Intralesional autologous mesenchymal stem cells in management of osteonecrosis of femur: a preliminary study.

Authors:  S Rastogi; S R Sankineani; H L Nag; S Mohanty; G Shivanand; K Marimuthu; R Kumar; L Rijal
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2013-07-14

5.  Correlative radiological, self-assessment and clinical analysis of evolution in instrumented dorsal and lateral fusion for degenerative lumbar spine disease. Autograft versus coralline hydroxyapatite.

Authors:  Panagiotis Korovessis; Georgios Koureas; Spyridon Zacharatos; Zisis Papazisis; Elias Lambiris
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-03-24       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Antimicrobial Formulations of Absorbable Bone Substitute Materials as Drug Carriers Based on Calcium Sulfate.

Authors:  D Pförringer; A Obermeier; M Kiokekli; H Büchner; S Vogt; A Stemberger; R Burgkart; M Lucke
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Assessing the stiffness of spinal fusion in animal models.

Authors:  Jocelyn M Cottrell; Marjolein C H van der Meulen; Joseph M Lane; Elizabeth R Myers
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2006-02

8.  Comparative Efficacy of Commonly Available Human Bone Graft Substitutes as Tested for Posterolateral Fusion in an Athymic Rat Model.

Authors:  Neil Bhamb; Linda E A Kanim; Susan Drapeau; Suneeth Mohan; Erick Vasquez; Dan Shimko; William McKAY; Hyun W Bae
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-10-31

9.  Microstructure and biomechanical characteristics of bone substitutes for trauma and orthopaedic surgery.

Authors:  Esther M M Van Lieshout; Gerdine H Van Kralingen; Youssef El-Massoudi; Harrie Weinans; Peter Patka
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Nanofiber-microsphere (nano-micro) matrices for bone regenerative engineering: a convergence approach toward matrix design.

Authors:  Clarke Nelson; Yusuf Khan; Cato T Laurencin
Journal:  Regen Biomater       Date:  2014-10-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.