Literature DB >> 8651126

Influence of obesity on the diagnostic value of electrocardiographic criteria for detecting left ventricular hypertrophy.

E Abergel1, M Tase, J Menard, G Chatellier.   

Abstract

Easily applicable, clinically relevant electrocardiographic criteria are needed to screen large populations for left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy. The aim of this study was to evaluate, in a population of 380 hypertensive patients of both sexes, whether obesity modified the diagnostic performance of Sokolow-Lyon and Cornell voltage criteria by comparing them with echocardiographic evaluations using different indexation methods for LV mass presentation (body surface area and various powers of the height variable). For the population as a whole, Cornell voltage was better correlated to LV mass than was Sokolow-Lyon voltage (r = 0.48 and 0.36, respectively). The poorest performance of Sokolow-Lyon voltage was observed among obese patients (best r = 0.1 and 0.21 in obese women and men, respectively). Sensitivities were assessed at a 95% specificity level. In nonobese patients, using sex-adjusted voltage values (43 and 36 mm in men and women, respectively, for Sokolow-Lyon voltage, and 28 and 25 mm for Cornell voltage), the sensitivities of Cornell voltage and Sokolow-Lyon voltage were similar in men and women (near 22% and 36%, respectively), whatever the indexation method used for LV mass. In obese patients, Cornell voltage sensitivity was similar to that of nonobese patients, whereas Sokolow-Lyon voltage had a much poorer sensitivity (<10%). For simple LV hypertrophy detection criteria, Sokolow-Lyon voltage should be avoided in obese hypertensive patients and replaced by the Cornell voltage criteria, which are not influenced by the presence of obesity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8651126     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(97)89209-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  18 in total

1.  The strain pattern, and not Sokolow-Lyon electrocardiographic voltage criteria, is independently associated with anatomic left ventricular hypertrophy.

Authors:  Shoichi Ehara; Takao Hasegawa; Kenji Matsumoto; Kenichiro Otsuka; Takanori Yamazaki; Tomokazu Iguchi; Yasukatsu Izumi; Kenei Shimada; Minoru Yoshiyama
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  Electrocardiographic criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy in aortic valve stenosis: Correlation with echocardiographic parameters.

Authors:  Karolina Bula; Anna Ćmiel; Monika Sejud; Karolina Sobczyk; Sylwia Ryszkiewicz; Krzysztof Szydło; Marcin Wita; Katarzyna Mizia-Stec
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 1.468

Review 3.  Electrocardiological features in obesity: the benefits of body surface potential mapping.

Authors:  Gábor Simonyi
Journal:  Cardiorenal Med       Date:  2014-07-05       Impact factor: 2.041

4.  Long-Term Effects of an Intensive Lifestyle Intervention on Electrocardiographic Criteria for Left Ventricular Hypertrophy: The Look AHEAD Trial.

Authors:  Tina E Brinkley; Andrea Anderson; Elsayed Z Soliman; Alain G Bertoni; Frank Greenway; William C Knowler; Stephen P Glasser; Edward S Horton; Mark A Espeland
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2018-04-13       Impact factor: 2.689

5.  Effect of Intensive Blood Pressure Lowering on Left Ventricular Hypertrophy in Patients With Hypertension: SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial).

Authors:  Elsayed Z Soliman; Walter T Ambrosius; William C Cushman; Zhu-Ming Zhang; Jeffrey T Bates; Javier A Neyra; Thaddeus Y Carson; Leonardo Tamariz; Lama Ghazi; Monique E Cho; Brian P Shapiro; Jiang He; Lawrence J Fine; Cora E Lewis
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Thresholds in the relationship between mortality and left ventricular hypertrophy defined by electrocardiography.

Authors:  Edward P Havranek; Caroline D B Emsermann; Desiree N Froshaug; Frederick A Masoudi; Mori J Krantz; Rebecca Hanratty; Raymond O Estacio; L Miriam Dickinson; John F Steiner
Journal:  J Electrocardiol       Date:  2008-03-14       Impact factor: 1.438

7.  Correlation relationship assessment between left ventricular hypertrophy voltage criteria and body mass index in 41,806 Swiss conscripts.

Authors:  Roger Abächerli; Lingchuan Zhou; Johann-Jakob Schmid; Richard Kobza; Bernhard Niggli; Franz Frey; Paul Erne
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.468

8.  Electrocardiograms in Healthy North American Children in the Digital Age.

Authors:  Elizabeth V Saarel; Suzanne Granger; Jonathan R Kaltman; L LuAnn Minich; Martin Tristani-Firouzi; Jeffrey J Kim; Kathleen Ash; Sabrina S Tsao; Charles I Berul; Elizabeth A Stephenson; David G Gamboa; Felicia Trachtenberg; Peter Fischbach; Victoria L Vetter; Richard J Czosek; Tiffanie R Johnson; Jack C Salerno; Nicole B Cain; Robert H Pass; Ilana Zeltser; Eric S Silver; Joshua R Kovach; Mark E Alexander
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2018-07

9.  The clinical value of apex beat and electrocardiography for the detection of left ventricular hypertrophy from the standpoint of the distance factors from the heart to the chest wall: a multislice CT study.

Authors:  Shoichi Ehara; Nobuyuki Shirai; Kenji Matsumoto; Takuhiro Okuyama; Yoshiki Matsumura; Junichi Yoshikawa; Minoru Yoshiyama
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2011-06-09       Impact factor: 3.872

10.  Electrocardiographic Versus Echocardiographic Left Ventricular Hypertrophy in Severe Aortic Stenosis.

Authors:  Aleksandra Budkiewicz; Michał A Surdacki; Aleksandra Gamrat; Katarzyna Trojanowicz; Andrzej Surdacki; Bernadeta Chyrchel
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 4.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.