Literature DB >> 8650274

Determining consistency of elbow joint threshold angle in elbow flexor muscles with spastic hypertonia.

S L Wolf1, R L Segal, P A Catlin, J Tschorn, T Raleigh, H Kontos, P Pate.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Threshold angle, the point in passive range of motion where a muscle response or torque change is elicited, may be a potentially valid measure of hypertonus. Because the relationship of initial muscle length to threshold angle has not been addressed previously, this preliminary study examined whether starting elbow joint position and speed of stretch to elbow flexor muscles affect threshold angle.
SUBJECTS: Five subjects with stroke-induced hypertonia of the elbow flexor muscles participated.
METHODS: Two starting angles and two designated stretch speeds were applied randomly by a torque motor at each of three testing sessions.
RESULTS: Starting angle, subject, and session affected threshold angle. A 90-degree starting angle at a stretch speed of approximately 1.0 radian/s produced the most consistent threshold angles between sessions within subjects, and threshold angle was relatively consistent for some subjects, irrespective of speed. CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION: If future research indicates that these data can be generalized, the use of threshold angle as a consistent measure of hypertonia will require comparison within individuals, use of a consistent starting angle, and a movement condition of a 90-degree starting angle and an approximate movement speed of 1.0 radian/s across sessions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8650274     DOI: 10.1093/ptj/76.6.586

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Ther        ISSN: 0031-9023


  8 in total

1.  Contributions of altered stretch reflex coordination to arm impairments following stroke.

Authors:  Randy D Trumbower; Vengateswaran J Ravichandran; Matthew A Krutky; Eric J Perreault
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Bilateral impairments in task-dependent modulation of the long-latency stretch reflex following stroke.

Authors:  Randy D Trumbower; James M Finley; Jonathan B Shemmell; Claire F Honeycutt; Eric J Perreault
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 3.708

3.  Modulation of stretch reflexes of the finger flexors by sensory feedback from the proximal upper limb poststroke.

Authors:  Gilles Hoffmann; Derek G Kamper; Jennifer H Kahn; William Z Rymer; Brian D Schmit
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Linear spring-damper model of the hypertonic elbow: reliability and validity.

Authors:  Patrick H McCrea; Janice J Eng; Antony J Hodgson
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2003-09-30       Impact factor: 2.390

5.  Reliability and Validity of a New Diagnostic Device for Quantifying Hemiparetic Arm Impairments: An Exploratory Study.

Authors:  Levinia Lara Van der Velden; Joyce Lisanne Benner; Bram Onneweer; Claudia Josephina Wilhelmina Haarman; Ruud Selles; Gerard Ribbers; Marij Eugenie Roebroeck
Journal:  J Rehabil Med       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Quantitative measurement of resistance force and subsequent attenuation during passive isokinetic extension of the wrist in patients with mild to moderate spasticity after stroke.

Authors:  Kentaro Kawamura; Seiji Etoh; Tomokazu Noma; Ryota Hayashi; Yuiko Jonoshita; Keisuke Natsume; Seiichi Niidome; Yong Yu; Megumi Shimodozono
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2022-10-13       Impact factor: 5.208

7.  Concurrent neuromechanical and functional gains following upper-extremity power training post-stroke.

Authors:  Carolynn Patten; Elizabeth G Condliffe; Christine A Dairaghi; Peter S Lum
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 4.262

8.  The relation between Ashworth scores and neuromechanical measurements of spasticity following stroke.

Authors:  Laila Alibiglou; William Z Rymer; Richard L Harvey; Mehdi M Mirbagheri
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 4.262

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.