Literature DB >> 8650167

Segregation of DNA polynucleotide strands into sister chromatids and the use of endoreduplicated cells to track sister chromatid exchanges induced by crosslinks, alkylations, or x-ray damage.

S Wolff1, V Afzal.   

Abstract

The method of Matsumoto and Ohta [Matsumoto, K. & Ohta, T. (1992) Chromosoma 102, 60-65; Matsumoto, K. & Ohta, T. (1995) Mutat. Res. 326, 93-98] to induce large numbers of endoreduplicated Chinese hamster ovary cells has now been coupled with the fluorescence-plus-Giemsa method of Perry and Wolff [Perry, P. & Wolff, S. (1974) Nature (London) 251, 156-158] to produce harlequin endoreduplicated chromosomes that after the third round of DNA replication are composed of a chromosome with a light chromatid and a dark chromatid in close apposition to its sister chromosome containing two light chromatids. Unless the pattern is disrupted by sister chromatid exchange (SCE), the dark chromatid is always in the center, so that the order of the chromatids is light-dark light-light. The advent of this method, which permits the observation of SCEs in endoreduplicated cells, makes it possible to determine with great ease in which cell cycle an SCE occurred. This now allows us to approach several vexing questions about the induction of SCEs (genetic damage and its repair) after exposure to various types of mutagenic carcinogens. The present experiments have allowed us to observe how many cell cycles various types of lesions that are induced in DNA by a crosslinking agent, an alkylating agent, or ionizing radiation, and that are responsible for the induction of SCEs, persist before being repaired and thus lose their ability to inflict genetic damage. Other experiments with various types of mutagenic carcinogens and various types of cell lines that have defects in different DNA repair processes, such as mismatch repair, excision repair, crosslink repair, and DNA-strand-break repair, can now be carried out to determine the role of these types of repair in removing specific types of lesions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8650167      PMCID: PMC39135          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.93.12.5765

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  20 in total

1.  ENDOREDUPLICATION IN HUMAN FIBROBLAST CULTURES.

Authors:  H G SCHWARZACHER; W SCHNEDL
Journal:  Cytogenetics       Date:  1965

2.  SPATIAL RELATIONSHIPS IN THE REPLICATION OF CHROMOSOMAL DNA.

Authors:  K H WALEN
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1965-06       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Sister Chromatid Exchanges in Tritium-Labeled Chromosomes.

Authors:  J H Taylor
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1958-05       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Sister chromatid exchange and chromatid interchange as possible manifestation of different DNA repair processes.

Authors:  M S Sasaki
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1977-10-13       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Sister chromatid exchanges induced in Chinese hamster cells by UV irradiation of different stages of the cell cycle: the necessity for cells to pass through S.

Authors:  S Wolff; J Bodycote; R B Painter
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1974-10       Impact factor: 2.433

6.  Differential Giemsa staining of sister chromatids and the study of chromatid exchanges without autoradiography.

Authors:  S Wolff; P Perry
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1974       Impact factor: 4.316

7.  Induction of endoreduplication by hydrazine in Chinese hamster V 79 cells and reduced incidence of sister chromatid exchanges in endoreduplicated mitoses.

Authors:  G Speit; K Mehnert; W Vogel
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 4.316

8.  Do the frequencies of sister chromatid exchanges in endoreduplicated mitoses provide a measure for lesion persistence and repair?

Authors:  G Speit; W Vogel; K Mehnert
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.316

9.  Sensitive period for the induction of endoreduplication by rotenone in cultured Chinese hamster cells.

Authors:  K Matsumoto; T Ohta
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 4.316

10.  Phases of the cell cycle sensitive to endoreduplication induction in CHO-K1 cells.

Authors:  K Matsumoto; T Ohta
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 2.433

View more
  2 in total

1.  X-irradiation of G1 CHO cells induces SCE which are both true and false in BrdU-substituted cells but only false in biotin-dUTP-substituted cells.

Authors:  E Bruckmann; A Wojcik; G Obe
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.239

2.  The diplochromosome of endoreduplicated cells: a new approach to highlight the mechanism of sister chromatid exchange.

Authors:  R Meschini; R Bastianelli; F Palitti
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 4.316

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.