Literature DB >> 8649680

Early oral feeding after cesarean delivery.

D Soriano1, M Dulitzki, N Keidar, G Barkai, S Mashiach, D S Seidman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the gastrointestinal function and patient acceptability of early initiation of oral feeding after cesarean delivery.
METHODS: Two hundred twenty-one healthy women delivered by cesarean were assigned in an alternating manner to receive either a high-protein, low-residue pudding initiated within 6 hours of delivery and given every 6 hours thereafter (n = 108), or a standard postoperative diet, consisting of sips of water 12 hours after surgery and a liquid diet permitted only after bowel sounds returned and flatus passed (n = 113).
RESULTS: Compared with the control group, the early-feeding group had a shorter mean (+/- standard deviation) duration of intravenous fluid administration, 18.6 +/- 6.3 versus 30.5 +/- 8.1 hours (P < .001); more rapid return to regular oral diet, 26.8 +/- 6.3 versus 39.7 +/- 8.8 hours (P < .001); and a shorter time to first bowel movement, 30.0 +/- 10.0 versus 43.3 +/- 11.7 hours (P < .001). There was no significant increase in gastrointestinal morbidity: 17.4 versus 15.6%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Early feeding after cesarean delivery was well tolerated and was associated with a more rapid return to a normal diet. This approach may facilitate early hospital discharge.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8649680     DOI: 10.1016/0029-7844(96)00049-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  3 in total

1.  Prospective, randomized, comparative study of Misgav Ladach versus traditional cesarean section at Nazareth Hospital, Kenya.

Authors:  L Ansaloni; R Brundisini; G Morino; A Kiura
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2.  Postoperative management and restrictions for female pelvic surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Miles Murphy; Cedric Olivera; Thomas Wheeler; Elizabeth Casiano; Nazema Siddiqui; Rajiv Gala; Tondalaya Gamble; Ethan M Balk; Vivian W Sung
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 3.  Early compared with delayed oral fluids and food after caesarean section.

Authors:  L Mangesi; G J Hofmeyr
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2002
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.