Literature DB >> 8648531

A prospective randomized trial comparing continuous versus intermittent feeding methods in very low birth weight neonates.

M A Silvestre1, C A Morbach, Y W Brans, S Shankaran.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of continuous versus intermittent feedings on physical growth, gastrointestinal tolerance, and macronutrient retention in very low birth weight infants ( < 1500 gm). STUDY
DESIGN: Very low birth weight neonates stratified by birth weight were randomly assigned to either continuous (24-hour) or intermittent (every 3 hours) nasogastric feedings. Feedings with half-strength Similac Special Care formula were initiated between day 2 and 3 and were advanced isoenergetically to goal. Daily weights, volume/caloric intakes, weekly anthropometric and dynamic skin-fold thickness measurements, and data on feeding milestones and clinical complications were collected. Nitrogen, carbohydrate, and fat balance studies were performed on a subset of male subjects.
RESULTS: Eighty-two neonates with birth weights between 750 and 1500 gm who were born between 27 and 34 weeks of gestation were randomly assigned to continuous (n = 42) and intermittent (n = 40) feeding groups. There were no significant differences in baseline demographics and severity of respiratory distress between groups. There were no significant differences in days to regain birth weight, days to full enteral feedings, days to discharge, and discharge anthropometric measurements between continuously fed and intermittently fed infants, both when evaluated together and according to 250 gm weight intervals. Retention rates of nitrogen, fat, total carbohydrate, and lactose were comparable in the continuously fed (n = 17) and intermittently fed (n = 13) male neonates. Very low birth weight neonates who were fed continuously did not have feeding-related complications.
CONCLUSION: Very low birth weight infants achieve similar growth and macronutrient retention rates and have comparable lengths of hospital stay whether they are fed with continuous or intermittent feedings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8648531     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3476(96)70324-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr        ISSN: 0022-3476            Impact factor:   4.406


  13 in total

Review 1.  Feeding issues in preterm infants.

Authors:  R J Cooke; N D Embleton
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 5.747

Review 2.  Early enteral feeding of the preterm infant.

Authors:  A F Williams
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 5.747

Review 3.  Continuous nasogastric milk feeding versus intermittent bolus milk feeding for premature infants less than 1500 grams.

Authors:  Shahirose S Premji; Lorraine Chessell
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-11-09

4.  Anabolic signaling and protein deposition are enhanced by intermittent compared with continuous feeding in skeletal muscle of neonates.

Authors:  Samer W El-Kadi; Agus Suryawan; Maria C Gazzaneo; Neeraj Srivastava; Renán A Orellana; Hanh V Nguyen; Gerald E Lobley; Teresa A Davis
Journal:  Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 4.310

5.  Intermittent bolus feeding promotes greater lean growth than continuous feeding in a neonatal piglet model.

Authors:  Samer W El-Kadi; Claire Boutry; Agus Suryawan; Maria C Gazzaneo; Renán A Orellana; Neeraj Srivastava; Hanh V Nguyen; Scot R Kimball; Marta L Fiorotto; Teresa A Davis
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 7.045

Review 6.  Nutritional management of newborn infants: practical guidelines.

Authors:  Xiao-Ming Ben
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-10-28       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Viscera and muscle protein synthesis in neonatal pigs is increased more by intermittent bolus than by continuous feeding.

Authors:  Samer W El-Kadi; María C Gazzaneo; Agus Suryawan; Renán A Orellana; Roberto Murgas Torrazza; Neeraj Srivastava; Scot R Kimball; Hanh V Nguyen; Marta L Fiorotto; Teresa A Davis
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 3.756

8.  Factors Influencing Breast Milk Fat Loss during Administration in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.

Authors:  Mattias Paulsson; Lena Jacobsson; Fredrik Ahlsson
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-06-05       Impact factor: 5.717

9.  Continuous nasogastric milk feeding versus intermittent bolus milk feeding for preterm infants less than 1500 grams.

Authors:  Shahirose Sadrudin Premji; Lorraine Chessell; Fiona Stewart
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-06-24

10.  Achieving optimal feeds for preterm babies, recommendations and realities in practice: nigerian perspective.

Authors:  A I Ayede
Journal:  Ann Ib Postgrad Med       Date:  2011-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.