Literature DB >> 8648494

Musculoskeletal Function Assessment instrument: criterion and construct validity.

R Engelberg1, D P Martin, J Agel, W Obremsky, G Coronado, M F Swiontkowski.   

Abstract

The Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (MFA) instrument, a health status instrument with 100 self-reported health items, was designed for use with the broad range of patients with musculoskeletal disorders of the extremities commonly seen in clinical practice. In this paper, we report on its criterion and construct validity. Criterion validity was tested against physicians' ratings of patient functioning (e.g., upper functioning, lower functioning, daily activities, recreational functioning, emotional adjustment, and overall functioning) and standard clinical measures (e.g., grip strength, walking speed, fine motor skills, knee and elbow strength, and range of motion). Significant correlations (p < or = 0.05) between its scores, physicians' ratings, and clinical measures support the MFA's criterion validity. Construct validity was demonstrated against existing measures of health status (e.g., measures of lower and upper mobility, activity level and satisfaction, health status, social support, pain, emotional status, and quality of life), in accordance with clinical hypotheses about the effect of musculoskeletal disorders on functioning (e.g., type and number of problems, severity of illness or injury, and comorbidities) and by an analysis of demographic characteristics (e.g., sex, education, income, health insurance, and employment) against the MFA scores. Discriminant construct validity was supported in an analysis of MFA scores by patient disease groups (p < or = 0.01).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8648494     DOI: 10.1002/jor.1100140204

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  23 in total

1.  Users' guide to the surgical literature: how to use a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mohit Bhandari; P J Devereaux; Victor Montori; Claudio Cinà; Ved Tandan; Gordon H Guyatt
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 2.  Evaluation of instruments for measuring the burden of sport and active recreation injury.

Authors:  Nadine E Andrew; Belinda J Gabbe; Rory Wolfe; Peter A Cameron
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 3.  Which are the most frequently used outcome instruments in studies on total ankle arthroplasty?

Authors:  Florian D Naal; Franco M Impellizzeri; Pascal F Rippstein
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-08-12       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  Health status and (health-related) quality of life during the recovery of distal radius fractures: a systematic review.

Authors:  M A C Van Son; J De Vries; J A Roukema; B L Den Oudsten
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2013-03-22       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 5.  A review of functional status measures for workers with upper extremity disorders.

Authors:  D F Salerno; C Copley-Merriman; T N Taylor; J Shinogle; R M Schulz
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.402

6.  WHOQOL-BREF Hindi questionnaire: Quality of life assessment in acetabular fracture patients.

Authors:  Umesh K Meena; Ramesh K Sen; Prateek Behera; Sujit K Tripathy; Sameer Aggrawal; Sreekanth R Rajoli
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.251

7.  Life impact of ankle fractures: qualitative analysis of patient and clinician experiences.

Authors:  Steven M McPhail; Joel Dunstan; Julie Canning; Terry P Haines
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 8.  Theoretical framework and methodological development of common subjective health outcome measures in osteoarthritis: a critical review.

Authors:  Beth Pollard; Marie Johnston; Diane Dixon
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 3.186

9.  Study to prospectively evaluate reamed intramedually nails in patients with tibial fractures (S.P.R.I.N.T.): study rationale and design.

Authors:  Mohit Bhandari; Gordon Guyatt; Paul Tornetta; Emil Schemitsch; Marc Swiontkowski; David Sanders; Stephen D Walter
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2008-06-23       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 10.  Treatment of skeletal muscle injury: a review.

Authors:  L Baoge; E Van Den Steen; S Rimbaut; N Philips; E Witvrouw; K F Almqvist; G Vanderstraeten; L C Vanden Bossche
Journal:  ISRN Orthop       Date:  2012-04-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.