BACKGROUND: Although studies that use the double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge suggest that the prevalence of food allergy is about 2%, public belief in food allergy appears to be considerably higher. OBJECTIVE: The study was undertaken to determine the magnitude and features of the American public's belief in food allergy by surveying a large, demographically balanced population. METHODS: A simple question about food allergy was incorporated into a broad, self-reported, mailed consumer questionnaire. Five thousand demographically representative American households were surveyed by means of quota sample in 1989, 1992, and 1993. RESULTS: The response rates were 79%, 75%, and 74%, respectively. Of responding households, 16.2%, 16.6%, and 13.9%, respectively, reported an average of 1.17 household members with food allergy. Individuals reported to be allergic to foods were more likely to be female, particularly adult women. Male individuals with reported food allergy tended to be young, whereas no such skew was noted among female subjects. Geographic differences were observed in reported food allergy, with the highest rate in the Pacific region. Milk and chocolate were the individual foods most frequently implicated in food allergy. Trends were consistent over the period studied. CONCLUSIONS: Perceived food allergy is widespread and persistent. The characteristics and demographic patterns of this belief are not reflective of known food allergy epidemiology derived from studies in which the double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge is used.
BACKGROUND: Although studies that use the double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge suggest that the prevalence of food allergy is about 2%, public belief in food allergy appears to be considerably higher. OBJECTIVE: The study was undertaken to determine the magnitude and features of the American public's belief in food allergy by surveying a large, demographically balanced population. METHODS: A simple question about food allergy was incorporated into a broad, self-reported, mailed consumer questionnaire. Five thousand demographically representative American households were surveyed by means of quota sample in 1989, 1992, and 1993. RESULTS: The response rates were 79%, 75%, and 74%, respectively. Of responding households, 16.2%, 16.6%, and 13.9%, respectively, reported an average of 1.17 household members with food allergy. Individuals reported to be allergic to foods were more likely to be female, particularly adult women. Male individuals with reported food allergy tended to be young, whereas no such skew was noted among female subjects. Geographic differences were observed in reported food allergy, with the highest rate in the Pacific region. Milk and chocolate were the individual foods most frequently implicated in food allergy. Trends were consistent over the period studied. CONCLUSIONS: Perceived food allergy is widespread and persistent. The characteristics and demographic patterns of this belief are not reflective of known food allergy epidemiology derived from studies in which the double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge is used.
Authors: Alessandro Fiocchi; Jan Brozek; Holger Schünemann; Sami L Bahna; Andrea von Berg; Kirsten Beyer; Martin Bozzola; Julia Bradsher; Enrico Compalati; Motohiro Ebisawa; Maria Antonieta Guzman; Haiqi Li; Ralf G Heine; Paul Keith; Gideon Lack; Massimo Landi; Alberto Martelli; Fabienne Rancé; Hugh Sampson; Airton Stein; Luigi Terracciano; Stefan Vieths Journal: World Allergy Organ J Date: 2010-04-23 Impact factor: 4.084
Authors: Jennifer Johnson; Magnus P Borres; Lennart Nordvall; Jonas Lidholm; Christer Janson; Kjell Alving; Andrei Malinovschi Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-04-29 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Bright I Nwaru; Sukhmeet S Panesar; Lennart Hickstein; Tamara Rader; Thomas Werfel; Antonella Muraro; Karin Hoffmann-Sommergruber; Graham Roberts; Aziz Sheikh Journal: Clin Transl Allergy Date: 2013-04-01 Impact factor: 5.871
Authors: Daniel W Harrington; Susan J Elliott; Ann E Clarke; Moshe Ben-Shoshan; Samuel Godefroy Journal: Hum Ecol Risk Assess Date: 2012-11-06 Impact factor: 5.190
Authors: Antonios Patelis; Maria Gunnbjörnsdottir; Magnus P Borres; Peter Burney; Thorarinn Gislason; Kjell Torén; Bertil Forsberg; Kjell Alving; Andrei Malinovschi; Christer Janson Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-01-10 Impact factor: 3.240