Literature DB >> 8647747

Middle latency responses to acoustical and electrical stimulation of the cochlea in cats.

J Popelár1, R Hartmann, J Syka, R Klinke.   

Abstract

The middle latency responses (MLR) to acoustical stimulation (A-MLR) as well as to electrical stimulation (E-MLR) of the inner ear were recorded in pentobarbital-anaesthetised cats. Monopolar and bipolar MLR recordings were performed with electrodes located at different places on the primary auditory cortex (AI). The cochlea was electrically stimulated (ES) through a single round-window electrode or through a multichannel intracochlear implant. The slope of amplitude-intensity functions of the A-MLR was steeper when the stimulus frequency of the acoustical stimuli corresponded to the tonotopical recording place on the auditory cortex. Other response properties (waveshape, thresholds and latencies) were related to the recording site and stimulus frequency in only two-thirds of animals. Parameters of E-MLRs evoked by high-frequency ( > 4 kHz) and low-intensity ES in hearing cats, which produced an electrophonic effect, were similar to parameters of acoustically evoked MLRs. In deafened cats, the properties of responses to extracochlear ES were different from those recorded to acoustical stimulation and they were almost uniform in all cortical places. Variations in thresholds, in latencies and in the slope of the amplitude-intensity functions of the E-MLRs recorded in individual tonotopical cortical places were observed when the auditory nerve was stimulated with different configurations of electrodes through a multichannel intracochlear implant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8647747     DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(95)00199-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  6 in total

Review 1.  Cochlear implants and brain stem implants.

Authors:  Richard T Ramsden
Journal:  Br Med Bull       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.291

2.  Adult-Onset Hearing Impairment Induces Layer-Specific Cortical Reorganization: Evidence of Crossmodal Plasticity and Central Gain Enhancement.

Authors:  Ashley L Schormans; Marei Typlt; Brian L Allman
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 3.  Cochlear implants and brain plasticity.

Authors:  James B Fallon; Dexter R F Irvine; Robert K Shepherd
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-09-01       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 4.  Neural prostheses and brain plasticity.

Authors:  James B Fallon; Dexter R F Irvine; Robert K Shepherd
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2009-10-23       Impact factor: 5.379

Review 5.  Central gain control in tinnitus and hyperacusis.

Authors:  Benjamin D Auerbach; Paulo V Rodrigues; Richard J Salvi
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2014-10-24       Impact factor: 4.003

6.  Area-dependent change of response in the rat's inferior colliculus to intracochlear electrical stimulation following neonatal cochlear damage.

Authors:  Miyako Hatano; Jack B Kelly; Huiming Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.