Treatment of severe non-neonatal ARDS in children with surfactant and nitric oxide in a "pre-ECMO"-situation.

The use of exogenous surfactant and nitric oxide in neonates has reduced the number of infants requiring ECMO. The purpose of this study was to demonstrate whether these two therapeutic options might reduce the number of over 28 days old children with severe ARDS requiring ECMO, without reducing changes of survival and morbidity. Over a 30 month period all non-neonatal ARDS patients transferred to our institution for ECMO evaluation were treated based on a study-algorithm. If they did not fulfill "fast entry criteria" (paO2 < 40 for more than 3 hrs.) we first tried different ventilation, vasodilatation, and hemodynamic strategies for max. 4 hrs. (inv. I/E ratio, HFOV, epoprostenol, high doses norepinephrine. If the OI did not decrease by < 10, 30-280 mg natural surfactant or 1-20 ppm nitric oxide were treatment options depending on the degree of pulmonary hypertension measured by echocardiography and by mixed venous saturation measurements. It was possible to use NO and surfactant sequentially. The patients had different etiologies of ARDS as near drowning, pneumonia, immunosuppression, and sepsis. If their OI did not decrease by 10 in 8 hrs. ECMO was installed. Nineteen patients were evaluated, 6 improved with conventional therapy, their OI decreased without a relapse (mean OI at begin of the study: 38). Six patients improved with surfactant therapy alone (mean OI: 54), 4 patients improved after surfactant and sequential NO-treatment, 3 patients were initially treated with NO, 1 sequentially with surfactant. One patient did not show any benefit from NO or surfactant and was put on ECMO. Three patients died (withdrawal of life support because of severe brain damage caused by the underlying disease). We could not observe any respiratory related failure. No patient had to be discharged on oxygen. A sophisticated treatment algorithm integrating different modern ARDS treatment options can reduce the number of patients requiring ECMO. We speculate however that these options can only be used effectively in centers involved in ARDS treatment quite frequently and that these centers have to provide ECMO as one of their therapeutic tools.