Literature DB >> 8647039

Spatial differences in the sites of direct and indirect activation of corticospinal neurones by magnetic stimulation.

S A Wilson1, B L Day, G W Thickbroom, F L Mastaglia.   

Abstract

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over the human motor cortex evokes multiple descending volleys possibly through activation of different elements within the brain. We have investigated whether such elements can be distinguished spatially. Using a figure of eight coil, TMS was delivered over multiple scalp sites during a low level voluntary contraction of the left first dorsal interosseous muscle. At near-threshold intensity, early or late surface electromyograph (EMG) components (relative to anodal response latency) could be preferentially evoked with the coil aligned in a medio-lateral (ML), antero-posterior (AP), or postero-anterior (PA) orientation. The optimal location of the earliest component with ML coil orientation was 8 mm medial and 5 mm anterior compared to a later component with AP orientation. The optimal location for the same latency EMG component mapped using two different coil orientations (AP and ML) was not significantly different. The optimal location of two different late components, one obtained with AP and the other with PA coil orientations, was similar. It is argued that the earliest TMS-evoked component results from direct activation of corticospinal cell axons while later components result from activation of these cells trans-synaptically (indirectly), and that consequently there is a substantial spatial separation between these activation sites.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8647039     DOI: 10.1016/0924-980x(96)95148-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0013-4694


  8 in total

1.  The effect of long-term TENS on persistent neuroplastic changes in the human cerebral cortex.

Authors:  Raf L J Meesen; Koen Cuypers; John C Rothwell; Stephan P Swinnen; Oron Levin
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Changes in motor-evoked potential latency during grasping after tetraplegia.

Authors:  Hang Jin Jo; Monica A Perez
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Nonphysiological factors in navigated TMS studies; confounding covariates and valid intracortical estimates.

Authors:  Sein Schmidt; Rouven Bathe-Peters; Robert Fleischmann; Maria Rönnefarth; Michael Scholz; Stephan A Brandt
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Enhancement of Neuromodulation with Novel Pulse Shapes Generated by Controllable Pulse Parameter Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.

Authors:  Stefan M Goetz; Bruce Luber; Sarah H Lisanby; David L K Murphy; I Cassie Kozyrkov; Warren M Grill; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 5.  Rehabilitating the addicted brain with transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Marco Diana; Tommi Raij; Miriam Melis; Aapo Nummenmaa; Lorenzo Leggio; Antonello Bonci
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 34.870

6.  Distinct Corticocortical Contributions to Human Precision and Power Grip.

Authors:  Paolo Federico; Monica A Perez
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  Effect of coil orientation on motor-evoked potentials in humans with tetraplegia.

Authors:  Hang Jin Jo; Vincenzo Di Lazzaro; Monica A Perez
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Primary motor cortex function and motor skill acquisition: insights from threshold-hunting TMS.

Authors:  John Cirillo; John G Semmler; Ronan A Mooney; Winston D Byblow
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-03-28       Impact factor: 1.972

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.