Literature DB >> 8646179

Objective measurement of contrast sensitivity and visual acuity with the steady-state visual evoked potential.

H Strasburger1, A Remky, I J Murray, C Hadjizenonos, I Rentschler.   

Abstract

Since the appearance of Campbell and Maffei's and Harter and White's reports it has been well established that the visual evoked potential (VEP) can be used to predict psychophysical contrast sensitivity and visual acuity and is thus suited as an objective technique to assess these fundamental aspects of vision. Nevertheless, the technique has not become a standard diagnostic tool, being too time-consuming to apply and suffering from variable reliability under pathological visual conditions. In addition, there are problems of reliability in normal subjects. By using an unconventional stimulus--temporally sinusoidal 16-Hz on-off modulation of sinewave gratings--we demonstrated that these problems can be alleviated in normal subjects. This stimulus avoids the low signals in the visible range that frequently occur with conventional pattern-reversal stimuli, it leads to high correspondence between normal observers, and it is much faster to apply than are transient VEPs. Initial applications of this stimulus to amblyopes yielded promising results. The steady-state VEP could consequently turn into a viable diagnostic procedure in disturbances of visual contrast perception.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8646179

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ger J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0941-2921


  9 in total

1.  Pattern visual evoked potentials for identifying malingering.

Authors:  I-Ting Sun; Jong-Jer Lee; Hsiu-Mei Huang; Hsi-Kung Kuo
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-01-25       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Characteristics of Pattern Visual Evoked Potential in Two Eyes with Varying Visual Acuity in One Eye and Forensic Application.

Authors:  Fu-Quan Jia; Yu-Guang Liang; Xin-Yuan Zhang; Fang-Liang Luo; Yan-He Xiong; Long-Long Cheng; Ji-Hui Liu
Journal:  Curr Med Sci       Date:  2018-04-30

3.  Visual evoked potential-based acuity assessment: overestimation in amblyopia.

Authors:  Yaroslava Wenner; Sven P Heinrich; Christina Beisse; Antje Fuchs; Michael Bach
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Comparison of preferential looking acuity and pattern reversal visual evoked response acuity in pediatric patients.

Authors:  O Katsumi; S Denno; M Arai; J De Lopes Faria; T Hirose
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  A frequency-tagging electrophysiological method to identify central and peripheral visual field deficits.

Authors:  Noémie Hébert-Lalonde; Lionel Carmant; Dima Safi; Marie-Sylvie Roy; Maryse Lassonde; Dave Saint-Amour
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-05-10       Impact factor: 2.379

Review 6.  VEP estimation of visual acuity: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ruth Hamilton; Michael Bach; Sven P Heinrich; Michael B Hoffmann; J Vernon Odom; Daphne L McCulloch; Dorothy A Thompson
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-06-02       Impact factor: 2.379

7.  [Sighted and blind in one person: a case report and conclusions on the psychoneurobiology of vision].

Authors:  B Waldvogel; A Ullrich; H Strasburger
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 1.214

8.  Predicting potential acuities in amblyopes: predicting post-therapy acuity in amblyopes.

Authors:  William H Ridder; Michael W Rouse
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-02-20       Impact factor: 1.854

Review 9.  Assessment of Human Visual Acuity Using Visual Evoked Potential: A Review.

Authors:  Xiaowei Zheng; Guanghua Xu; Kai Zhang; Renghao Liang; Wenqiang Yan; Peiyuan Tian; Yaguang Jia; Sicong Zhang; Chenghang Du
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 3.576

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.