OBJECTIVE: To collect a valid, complete, continuous, and representative database of morbidity presenting to primary care and to use the data to help commission services on the basis of local need and effectiveness. SETTING: Computerised general practices in Somerset. METHODS: Participating general practices were selected to be representative of the district health authority population for general practice and population characteristics. All conditions presented at face to face consultations were assigned a Read code and episode type and the data were regularly validated. Data were sent by modem from the practices via a third party to the health authority each week. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportion of consultations coded and accuracy of coding. RESULTS: 11 practices agreed to participate. Validations for completeness during April 1994 to March 1995 revealed that 96.4% of the records were coded; 94% of the 1090 records validated had appropriate episode types and 87% appropriate Read codes. The results have been used to help formulate the health authority's purchasing plans and have enabled a change in the local contracts for surgery for glue ear. CONCLUSIONS: The project has shown the feasibility of establishing a network of practices recording and reporting the morbidity seen in primary care. Early indications are that the data can be useful in evidence based purchasing.
OBJECTIVE: To collect a valid, complete, continuous, and representative database of morbidity presenting to primary care and to use the data to help commission services on the basis of local need and effectiveness. SETTING: Computerised general practices in Somerset. METHODS: Participating general practices were selected to be representative of the district health authority population for general practice and population characteristics. All conditions presented at face to face consultations were assigned a Read code and episode type and the data were regularly validated. Data were sent by modem from the practices via a third party to the health authority each week. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportion of consultations coded and accuracy of coding. RESULTS: 11 practices agreed to participate. Validations for completeness during April 1994 to March 1995 revealed that 96.4% of the records were coded; 94% of the 1090 records validated had appropriate episode types and 87% appropriate Read codes. The results have been used to help formulate the health authority's purchasing plans and have enabled a change in the local contracts for surgery for glue ear. CONCLUSIONS: The project has shown the feasibility of establishing a network of practices recording and reporting the morbidity seen in primary care. Early indications are that the data can be useful in evidence based purchasing.
Authors: Mark Porcheret; Rhian Hughes; Dai Evans; Kelvin Jordan; Tracy Whitehurst; Helen Ogden; Peter Croft Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2003-10-05 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Caitlin R Finley; Derek S Chan; Scott Garrison; Christina Korownyk; Michael R Kolber; Sandra Campbell; Dean T Eurich; Adrienne J Lindblad; Ben Vandermeer; G Michael Allan Journal: Can Fam Physician Date: 2018-11 Impact factor: 3.275