Literature DB >> 8643885

Autoregressive age-period-cohort models.

W C Lee1, R S Lin.   

Abstract

Age-period-cohort analysis of vital data has received much attention recently, and it is already well known that the exact linear relation of the three time factors creates a non-identifiability problem. Previous studies have shown that the curvature terms of these factors are estimable but the linear trends are not. However, little attention has been paid to the possibility that the effects due to cohort and/or period might change through time stochastically rather than deterministically and hence display a stochastic trend. In this paper, we model the cohort effects as an AR(1) process and use lung cancer mortality data from 1966 to 1990 for males in Taiwan as an example. The parameters are identifiable in the proposed model and the estimates are found to be stable. However, the assumption made in the model should be carefully considered before using our methodology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8643885     DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19960215)15:3<273::AID-SIM172>3.0.CO;2-R

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  10 in total

1.  Secular trends in adolescent never smoking from 1990 to 1999 in California: an age-period-cohort analysis.

Authors:  Xinguang Chen; Guohua Li; Jennifer B Unger; Xiaowei Liu; C Anderson Johnson
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Trends in U.S. adult chronic disease mortality, 1960-1999: age, period, and cohort variations.

Authors:  Yang Yang
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2008-05

3.  A multiphase method for estimating cohort effects in age-period contingency table data.

Authors:  Katherine M Keyes; Guohua Li
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2010-06-02       Impact factor: 3.797

4.  A new approach to age-period-cohort analysis using partial least squares regression: the trend in blood pressure in the Glasgow Alumni cohort.

Authors:  Yu-Kang Tu; George Davey Smith; Mark S Gilthorpe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Predicting emergency departments visit rates from septicemia in Taiwan using an age-period-cohort model, 1998 to 2012.

Authors:  I-Shiang Tzeng; Su-Hsun Liu; Yu Ting Chiou; Chien-Hsiung Huang; Cheng-Jung Lee; Cheng-Yu Chien; Shou-Chien Hsu; Yi-Ming Weng; Kuan-Fu Chen; Jih-Chang Chen
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 1.889

6.  Chagas disease mortality in Brazil: A Bayesian analysis of age-period-cohort effects and forecasts for two decades.

Authors:  Taynãna César Simões; Laiane Félix Borges; Auzenda Conceição Parreira de Assis; Maria Vitórias Silva; Juliano Dos Santos; Karina Cardoso Meira
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2018-09-28

7.  The influence of the age-period-cohort effects on the temporal trend mortality from schistosomiasis in Brazil from 1980 to 2014.

Authors:  Taynãna César Simões; Roberto Sena; Karina Cardoso Meira
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Age-period-cohort analysis with a constant-relative-variation constraint for an apportionment of period and cohort slopes.

Authors:  Shih-Yung Su; Wen-Chung Lee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Age-period-cohort analysis for trends in body mass index in Ireland.

Authors:  Tao Jiang; Mark S Gilthorpe; Frances Shiely; Janas M Harrington; Ivan J Perry; Cecily C Kelleher; Yu-Kang Tu
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Mortality trends in chronic liver disease and cirrhosis from 1981 to 2015 in Taiwan.

Authors:  Shih-Yung Su; Long-Teng Lee; Wen-Chung Lee
Journal:  Popul Health Metr       Date:  2021-10-02
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.