Literature DB >> 8643149

Antiproteinuric effect of blood-pressure-lowering agents: a meta-analysis of comparative trials.

R T Gansevoort1, W J Sluiter, M H Hemmelder, D de Zeeuw, P E de Jong.   

Abstract

Whether ACE inhibitors (ACEi) differ from other antihypertensives in their efficacy to lower proteinuria is controversial. We therefore performed a meta-analysis of articles on this subject. The secondary objective in our meta-analysis was to study whether there is any difference between diabetic and non-diabetic patients in antiproteinuric response to blood pressure reduction. To identify all articles we performed a computer search using the bibliographic databases. To minimize publication bias, only trials in which a direct comparison was made between an ACEi and another antihypertensive were included. Studies performed both in diabetic and in non-diabetic patients were eligible. Included were 41 studies, comprising 1124 patients, of which 558 had non-diabetic renal disease. The mean antiproteinuric effect of ACEi was significantly greater than that of their comparator drugs: -39.9% (95% confidence interval: -42.8 to 36.8%) versus -17.0% (-19.0 to -15.1%) respectively (difference 24% (19.5 to 28.6%)). The blood-pressure-lowering effect was equal: -12.0% (-12.8 to -11.2%) versus -11.4% (-11.7 to -11.1%) respectively (difference -0.8% (-1.8 to 0.2%)). Thus it may be concluded that ACEIs confer an antiproteinuric effect beyond that attributable to their blood-pressure-lowering effect. A wide interstudy variation in antiproteinuric response to non-ACEI antihypertensives was observed. Multiple variable regression analysis was performed to assess which factors may explain this heterogeneity. From the comparator drugs, the class was of no importance: calcium-channel antagonists (CCA), beta-blockers, and a rest group of other drug types showed a similar response. Patient characteristics such as initial GFR and blood pressure partly explained the variation in response, but most of it appeared dependent on the blood pressure reduction achieved. Furthermore the type of CCA is of importance, with nifedipine having the least effect. A significantly greater antiproteinuric effect of 'non-ACEI' antihypertensives was found in diabetic patients compared to non-diabetics. However, this coincided with a greater blood pressure reduction in diabetics. Adjusted for differences in blood pressure control, diabetics showed even a slightly lesser antiproteinuric response to non-ACEI antihypertensive compared to non-diabetics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8643149

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant        ISSN: 0931-0509            Impact factor:   5.992


  41 in total

Review 1.  Complications of diabetes: renal disease and promotion of self-management.

Authors:  A Melville; R Richardson; D Lister-Sharp; A McIntosh
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  2000-12

2.  The impact of antihypertensive drug groups on urinary albumin excretion in a non-diabetic population.

Authors:  Taco B M Monster; Wilbert M T Janssen; Paul E de Jong; Lolkje T W de Jong-van den Berg
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 3.  Therapeutic modalities in diabetic nephropathy: standard and emerging approaches.

Authors:  Emaad M Abdel-Rahman; Lawand Saadulla; W Brian Reeves; Alaa S Awad
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Patterns of antihypertensive therapy among patients with diabetes.

Authors:  Michael L Johnson; Hardeep Singh
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Physicians make different decisions from nephrologists at serum creatinine 2.0 mg/dl.

Authors:  Kaichiro Tamba; Eiji Kusano; Kaoru Tabei; Eiji Kajii; Yasushi Asano
Journal:  Clin Exp Nephrol       Date:  2009-04-22       Impact factor: 2.801

Review 6.  Guidelines for the management of chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Adeera Levin; Brenda Hemmelgarn; Bruce Culleton; Sheldon Tobe; Philip McFarlane; Marcel Ruzicka; Kevin Burns; Braden Manns; Colin White; Francoise Madore; Louise Moist; Scott Klarenbach; Brendan Barrett; Robert Foley; Kailash Jindal; Peter Senior; Neesh Pannu; Sabin Shurraw; Ayub Akbari; Adam Cohn; Martina Reslerova; Vinay Deved; David Mendelssohn; Gihad Nesrallah; Joanne Kappel; Marcello Tonelli
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2008-11-18       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 7.  Use of calcium antagonists in renal patients: therapeutic benefit or medical malpractice?

Authors:  Douglas A Nigbor; Julia B Lewis
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 8.  Nephrotic syndrome in adults.

Authors:  Richard P Hull; David J A Goldsmith
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-05-24

9.  Quality of care for incident lupus nephritis among Medicaid beneficiaries in the United States.

Authors:  Jinoos Yazdany; Candace H Feldman; Jun Liu; Michael M Ward; Michael A Fischer; Karen H Costenbader
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 4.794

Review 10.  Treatment of lupus nephritis.

Authors:  Fayez F Hejaili; Louise M Moist; William F Clark
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 9.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.