Literature DB >> 8642184

New meta-analysis of treatment trials of hypertension: improving the estimate of therapeutic benefit.

F Gueyffier1, A Froment, M Gouton.   

Abstract

The objectives of this sub group meta-analysis on the treatment of hypertension was to: (1) high-light specific results of well-designed trials; (2) group trials according to their specific clinical context; (3) express results of the meta-analysis in absolute reduction terms; and (4) estimate the bias of withdrawal because of blood pressure increase. This meta-analysis is based on summarised published results from randomised controlled trials, comparing a drug treatment versus placebo or no treatment, with morbi-mortality as the principle outcome. The following data were analysed: (1) total mortality; (2) cardiovascular mortality; (3) stroke; (4) major coronary events; and (5) congestive heart failure. The treatment significantly reduced the incidence of all outcomes in trials involving older patients, avoiding up to nine strokes (OR = 0.66, 95% Cl: 0.56-0.77) and four major coronary events (OR = 0.79, 95% Cl: 0.68-0.92) every 1000 patient-years when the bias of withdrawal was taken into account. The only outcome significantly influenced by treatment in younger patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension was stroke, with one stroke avoided every 1000 patient-years (OR = 0.51, 95% Cl: 0.39-0.66). There was insufficient statistical power in the trials which enrolled patients with non-moderate hypertension to reach clinical significance, except for the reduction in the incidence of congestive heart failure. However, the results indicated a trend towards greater absolute benefit under treatment. Trials enrolling patients with post-stroke hypertension also had insufficient power, but suggested benefit by the reduction of the incidence of stroke recurrence and congestive heart failure under treatment. In conclusion, the most constant treatment benefit concerned stroke, although the absolute reduction was very modest in younger patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension. Only the results from trials in older patients showed a significant reduction of major coronary events. Such results need further analyses, ideally based on individual patient data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8642184

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hum Hypertens        ISSN: 0950-9240            Impact factor:   3.012


  28 in total

1.  Thresholds for taking antihypertensive drugs in different professional and lay groups: questionnaire survey.

Authors:  N Steel
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-05-27

Review 2.  Systematic review of antihypertensive therapies: does the evidence assist in choosing a first-line drug?

Authors:  J M Wright; C H Lee; G K Chambers
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1999-07-13       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 3.  What are the elements of good treatment for hypertension?

Authors:  C D Mulrow; M Pignone
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-05-05

4.  Modern management of hypertension and heart failure: evidence and practice.

Authors:  F D Hobbs
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.994

5.  Are we using blood pressure-lowering drugs appropriately? Perhaps now is the time for a change.

Authors:  F Gueyffier; J Wright
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 3.012

6.  The Secondary Prevention of Small Subcortical Strokes (SPS3) study.

Authors:  Oscar R Benavente; Carole L White; Lesly Pearce; Pablo Pergola; Ana Roldan; Marie-France Benavente; Christopher Coffey; Leslie A McClure; Jeff M Szychowski; Robin Conwit; Patricia A Heberling; George Howard; Carlos Bazan; Gabriela Vidal-Pergola; Robert Talbert; Robert G Hart
Journal:  Int J Stroke       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 5.266

7.  Persistence with treatment for hypertension in actual practice.

Authors:  J J Caro; M Salas; J L Speckman; G Raggio; J D Jackson
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1999-01-12       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 8.  Primary prevention of CVD: treating hypertension.

Authors:  Joseph Cheriyan; Kevin M O'Shaughnessy; Morris J Brown
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2010-02-18

Review 9.  The Perindopril Protection Against Recurrent Stroke Study (PROGRESS): clinical implications for older patients with cerebrovascular disease.

Authors:  Yogini Ratnasabapathy; Carlene M M Lawes; Craig S Anderson
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 10.  Primary prevention of CVD: modification of diet in people with hypertension.

Authors:  Raj Padwal; Daniel Hackam; Nadia Khan; Sheldon Tobe
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2016-01-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.