Literature DB >> 8639721

Five-year survival curves: how much data are enough for patient-physician decision making in general surgery?

D J Mazur1, D H Hickam.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To find out whether patients' preferences for a particular type of treatment are changed by the way in which the information is presented (point estimates-year 0 and year 5 data points-or two five-year survival curves).
DESIGN: Prospective study.
SETTING: University-based Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, USA.
SUBJECTS: 236 Consecutive patients seen in a general medical outpatient clinic.
INTERVENTIONS: Patients were asked to choose between two treatments, one with a 10% immediate mortality and 37% five-year survival (treatment A) and one with no immediate mortality and 22% five-year survival (treatment B). They were randomised to be given the survival data either as point estimates or as two five-year survival curves. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Number of patients who chose each treatment.
RESULTS: The mean age was 67 years (range 40-84) and mean duration of education was 13 years (range 0-22). Significantly fewer patients chose the treatment with better immediate survival when they were given the data as survival curves (47/140, 34% compared with 93/140, 66% p < 0.0001) than when they were given data as point estimates (57/96, 59%, compared with 39/96, 41%).
CONCLUSION: Patients are significantly more likely to make different decisions when given more data (in the form of five-year survival curves which show short, medium, and long term results) than when they are presented with only point estimates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8639721

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Surg        ISSN: 1102-4151


  4 in total

1.  When in doubt should we cut it out? The role of surgery in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  J-E C Holty; M K Gould
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 9.139

Review 2.  Design features of graphs in health risk communication: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jessica S Ancker; Yalini Senathirajah; Rita Kukafka; Justin B Starren
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2006-08-23       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Effect of different visual presentations on the comprehension of prognostic information: a systematic review.

Authors:  Eman Abukmail; Mina Bakhit; Chris Del Mar; Tammy Hoffmann
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2021-08-25       Impact factor: 2.796

4.  Discussing life expectancy with surgical patients: do patients want to know and how should this information be delivered?

Authors:  Michael G Clarke; Katherine P Kennedy; Ruaraidh P MacDonagh
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2008-06-15       Impact factor: 2.796

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.