Literature DB >> 8639194

Pattern of basic life support ambulance use in an urban pediatric population.

W J Brady1, H Hennes, A Wolf, K N Hall, M Davis.   

Abstract

To evaluate the pattern of use of basic life support (BLS) ambulances in a pediatric population, emergency medical service (EMS) and pediatric emergency department (PED) records from an urban hospital PED for all children transported to PED by ambulance during a 1-month study period were retrospectively reviewed. Excluded were: (1) advanced life support transport, (2) transport from other medical facility, (3) patients with chronic medical disability without acute decompensation, and (4) patients in police custody. BLS transport was considered inappropriate if: (1) no intervention by BLS technicians, (2) minimal to no intervention in the PED, and (3) discharge without prescription medication. Of 376 ambulance transports evaluated, 238 (63%) met entry criteria, and 105 (44%) transports met criteria for being inappropriate. The mean charge for appropriate transport was $240.68, and for inappropriate, $237.12 (P = .2). The total charge for inappropriate transports was $26,523.20. Patients on federal assistance had a significantly higher rate of inappropriate transport (51%) compared with patients who had commercial insurance (30%) and those who self paid (42%). Trauma was the most common cause for transport, 48% of which was inappropriate. It was concluded that inappropriate BLS transport of pediatric patients is common. This use is costly and may disrupt the delivery of EMS care to the remainder of the community. Efforts aimed at public education and providing alternative means of transport may significantly reduce charges and improve the delivery of EMS care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8639194     DOI: 10.1016/S0735-6757(96)90168-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Emerg Med        ISSN: 0735-6757            Impact factor:   2.469


  6 in total

1.  Medically unnecessary emergency medical services (EMS) transports among children ages 0 to 17 years.

Authors:  P Daniel Patterson; Elizabeth G Baxley; Janice C Probst; James R Hussey; Charity G Moore
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2006-07-01

2.  Inappropriate ambulance usage is a retrospective diagnosis.

Authors:  S Wilson; S Edwards; M W Cooke
Journal:  J Accid Emerg Med       Date:  1999-01

3.  Pediatric Use of Emergency Medical Services: The Role of Chronic Illnesses and Behavioral Health Problems.

Authors:  Amy R Knowlton; Brian Weir; Julie Fields; Gerald Cochran; Junette McWilliams; Lawrence Wissow; Benjamin J Lawner
Journal:  Prehosp Emerg Care       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.077

4.  Analysis of the Adequacy of Prehospital Emergency Medical Services Use of Patients Who Visited Emergency Departments in Korea from 2016 to 2018: Data from the National Emergency Department Information System.

Authors:  Sung Joon Park; Jung-Youn Kim; Young-Hoon Yoon; Eu Sun Lee; Hyun-Jin Kim; Seoung Bum Kim; Hyun Gu Kahng
Journal:  Emerg Med Int       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 1.112

5.  Swedish emergency medical services' identification of potential candidates for primary healthcare: Retrospective patient record study.

Authors:  Gabriella Norberg; Birgitta Wireklint Sundström; Lennart Christensson; Maria Nyström; Johan Herlitz
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2015-12-03       Impact factor: 2.581

6.  Identifying Frequent Users of an Urban Emergency Medical Service Using Descriptive Statistics and Regression Analyses.

Authors:  Chenelle Norman; Michael Mello; Bryan Choi
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2016-01-12
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.